Comments Thread For: Luis Ortiz vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Final Eliminator Ordered
Collapse
-
well am not in a position to say which fight is safer cos once you in there in the ring, you are on your own, any thing can happen, that's why it's HW.
Now if his team decided that he takes 25% for pulev, as far as he wins will guarantee him mega box against AJ, well, there is nothing anybody can do about it.
The trust is wilder has never given any fighter a payday cos he is looking for a payday himself.
So when you do the plus and minus, it could be team whyte is making the right decisions and there is still nothing you can do about that.
So relax, let's see how things play out.Comment
-
The truth is there is nothing any of the wilder fan girls can do about whyte decision. This ducking of a thing didn't start today, people have been saying it since the days of Jack Johnson.Comment
-
But Whyte's actions show he considers Pulev the safer fight. Pretty much anybody would consider Pulev the safer fight. King Kong was the most avoided fighter in the division for a reason.
Eddie Hearn is one of the best promoters in the world. Extremely intelligent. Knows exactly what he's doing. Whyte vs King Kong is a much bigger risk than Whyte vs Pulev. So even though 75/25 sucks for Whyte, it's still worth it to fight Pulev.Comment
-
Well, I wouldn't want to argue your position on this matter cos you have the right to choose your position but am of the opinion that Ortiz is quite overrated.But Whyte's actions show he considers Pulev the safer fight. Pretty much anybody would consider Pulev the safer fight. King Kong was the most avoided fighter in the division for a reason.
Eddie Hearn is one of the best promoters in the world. Extremely intelligent. Knows exactly what he's doing. Whyte vs King Kong is a much bigger risk than Whyte vs Pulev. So even though 75/25 sucks for Whyte, it's still worth it to fight Pulev.
If he is that good as some people on this site is trying to make us believe, he should have at least been a champ in one of the organizations. He just got his first title shot some few weeks back for crying out loud.
The only belt he has ever won was a WBA interim which was stripped off him after he failed a PED and the best name in his resume is Jennings which happens to be a level C fighter.
So I don't understand the fuse. Is it because wilder KO him? I don't understand.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
First you claim he posted it. Then you refuse to post it and tell me to go find it. Now you tell me I need to find him to get him to personally send me the thing he never posted that you claimed he posted?
This sound fair to you?Comment
-
The info is on the Internet. All this “claims” “it’s not fair” post is actually making me laugh. Like you are being prosecuted. These informations are on the Internet. A quick search would reveal those information for you. For your knowledge Michael Benson posted the reply on the 03/11/2017, that was like a month AFTER the wbc announce their “Final eliminator” and then got a lot of questions/queries on how and why is that fight a “final” Eliminator. To fend off questions they then deny it and said it was an error. So this are public info, this wasn’t a lie by a journalist or anyone else. This were the miscommunication from the WBC themselves.Comment
Comment