Comments Thread For: Horn's Promoter Rips Top Rank For Approaching Crawford-Khan

[WesternChamp]

If saying this makes you feel better or feel like you got back at me, fine. You come off as either an idiot or a c-cksucking fanboy posting this but you don't care.

Doesn't change the fact Bob protected Manny.



I don't think a UD loss dropping down in weight would have the same affect as a bludgeoning KO loss in your current weight class would.

You only think it does because it helps your narrative.

why you still avoiding?

so if crawford doesnt fight spence or thurman next then he's ducking and being protected. you cant have it both ways and i told you this from the jump.

and the bolded, getting beat by a smaller guy is much worst than getting beat by a naturally bigger guy. same reason why mikey said he would rather fight spence than loma

[The Big Dunn]

why you still avoiding?

so if crawford doesnt fight spence or thurman next then he's ducking and being protected. you cant have it both ways and i told you this from the jump.

and the bolded, getting beat by a smaller guy is much worst than getting beat by a naturally bigger guy. same reason why mikey said he would rather fight spence than loma

I answered this already. Just because manny ducked crawford and was protected from certain guys in the past doesn't mean the same thing happens when other guys don't fight.

We judge Manny's actions based off the facts. With Crawford, You've already decided how to judge it if he doesn't fight Spence with no facts. You will force it into the same narrative no matter what.

That just shows how much of a c-cksucking fanboy you are.

Just because Manny has issues with bigger men that can box, doesn't mean Crawford does. Just because Manny didn't want to PED test doesn't mean Crawford or Spence don't.

You keep trying to write the story before it happens and you can't do that.

[umop-ap!sdn]

no, he's protecting Manny's "world tour" so he can make money and pay TR what he owes and then finance he and his family's political future.

The 2nd he comes to the US and fights Crawford he not only gets bludgeoned and beaten but his purse goes to the IRS to pay what he owes.

You know all this but are trying to spin it as Bob protecting Crawford because you are a super slurping Manny fan.

I agree with you

[umop-ap!sdn]

so you're saying bob is protecting manny from crawford because of "world tour"?? what for??

you know damm well people in malaysia is not coming to see manny because he's on a winning streak lol, the world tour purpose is to give people from other country a chance to see manny fight live so they can milk whatever left of pac. its not to showcase pac's talent at this point! lmao! nice try doe!

The difference is, Bob did not think Manny could beat Floyd so protecting him from Floyd was in his best interests as Manny was already a huge draw. In this situ, Bob knows Crawford can beat Manny so he wanted to make the fight so Crawford, his future star, could get a boost off of Manny, his current star. However Manny and co were not having it and were not going to let Bob feed Manny to his young Lion to boost his name, as than Bob would just continue pushing Crawford to super stardom and officially have no use for Manny. Not hard to understand.

[WesternChamp]

I answered this already. Just because manny ducked crawford and was protected from certain guys in the past doesn't mean the same thing happens when other guys don't fight.

We judge Manny's actions based off the facts. With Crawford, You've already decided how to judge it if he doesn't fight Spence with no facts. You will force it into the same narrative no matter what.

That just shows how much of a c-cksucking fanboy you are.

Just because Manny has issues with bigger men that can box, doesn't mean Crawford does. Just because Manny didn't want to PED test doesn't mean Crawford or Spence don't.

You keep trying to write the story before it happens and you can't do that.

this proves crawford is being protected. look at this post! LOL!

im gonna ask again since you keep avoiding after making so many excuses.

after crawford's fight against jeff horn, if crawford doesnt fight spence or thurman next then its a clear duck and he's being protected.

[The Big Dunn]

im using the same logic apply to pac. deal with it.

See this right here is why you get no respect. You are all but admitting that the situations are different but you are going to "apply the same logic applied to pac" just because.

There wasn't logic applied to pac-it was a conclusion based on facts and his actions.

With Crawford and Spence you are not looking at any facts just force feeding the events into the same "logic applied to pac".

Why not just go with the facts. If Manny comes out looking worse, so what?

[WesternChamp]

I answered this already. Just because manny ducked crawford and was protected from certain guys in the past doesn't mean the same thing happens when other guys don't fight.

We judge Manny's actions based off the facts. With Crawford, You've already decided how to judge it if he doesn't fight Spence with no facts. You will force it into the same narrative no matter what.

That just shows how much of a c-cksucking fanboy you are.

Just because Manny has issues with bigger men that can box, doesn't mean Crawford does. Just because Manny didn't want to PED test doesn't mean Crawford or Spence don't.

You keep trying to write the story before it happens and you can't do that.

so who has crawford fought that was bigger than him?

[WesternChamp]

See this right here is why you get no respect. You are all but admitting that the situations are different but you are going to "apply the same logic applied to pac" just because.

There wasn't logic applied to pac-it was a conclusion based on facts and his actions.

With Crawford and Spence you are not lloking at any facts or their actions-just force feeding the events into the same "logic applied to pac".

Why not just go with the facts. If Manny comes out looking worse, so what?

stop the crying. this is why you get shiieted on.

im using the same logic you used for manny.

if crawford doesnt fight spence or thurman next then its a clear duck and he's being protected. deal with it.

[The Big Dunn]

stop the crying. this is why you get shiieted on.

im using the same logic you used for manny.

if crawford doesnt fight spence or thurman next then its a clear duck and he's being protected. deal with it.

Huh? this post makes no sense. You are trying to take facts from 2 different situations and apply them to other situations. you can't do that and be expected to be seen as a rational adult.

I didn't use logic, I used facts. The facts of Floyd/manny and Crawford/Manny don't apply to Crawford/Spence or Crawford/Thurman or Crawford/Spence.

[WesternChamp]

Huh? this post makes no sense. You are trying to take facts from 2 different situations and apply them to other situations. you can't do that and be expected to be seen as a rational adult.

I didn't use logic, I used facts. The facts of Floyd/manny and Crawford/Manny don't apply to Crawford/Spence or Crawford/Thurman or Crawford/Spence.

yes it does.

when the subject of why manny is not fighting spence or thurman gets brought up, you said its because he's ducking them.

so if crawford doesnt fight spence or thurman next then he's also ducking them. plain and simple.