Comments Thread For: Photos: Jermall Charlo Crushes Hugo Centeno in Easy Two
Collapse
-
I was just wondering, do these undercover boxing fans was offered this fight and he Accepted which meant he wanted this fight lol. He dared to be great. But if charlo had lost then they'll be him a bum. Yup........ You correctly sniffed out the Terrible Ggg Alliance 🙏Leave a comment:
-
That can has been crushed
Hand picked Centeno was crushed by Maciej Sulecki AKA Jacobs opponent on the 28th.
We know Charlos looks great against chinny one dimensional guys but he'll avoid movers like BJS, Derevyanchenko and Danny Jacobs.
In turn, Saunders will avoid Jacobs and Derevyanchenko because they can both close the gap.
The fact that Charlo wants Golovkin is predictable, he'll never get a fight with Canelo , every named fighter makes him look ordinary and GGG is slowing down.
GGG it is, what a surprise!Last edited by factsarenice; 04-22-2018, 10:53 AM.Leave a comment:
-
I tend to only use The Ring rankings as the alphabet ones tend to include a lot of 'who the eff is that ?' fighters for whatever reason, also excluding holders of other alphabet belts.
eg at 130 the WBA rankings have Rafael Mensah (2) and James Tennyson (4), both ranked higher than Vargas, Farmer and Roman.
Agree with them or not, at least someone tries to provide some justification behind The Ring ratings (even if its dodgy at times) - the alphabet rankings just look random.Leave a comment:
-
-
Both Hailand and Centeno are ranked higher than these guys. Centeno Ranked #3 and Hailand #1 at the time of their fightsI stopped watching the fight after about a minute with the thought 'what the hell is Centeno doing in the ring ?'. It was already clear that he didn't belong in there and just a waste of Charlo's time (except its value as a stay-busy fight) and a waste of our time as there was only going to be one winner, Centeno had as much a chance as Heiland did.
So because Centeno had no better chance than Heiland, is that an indication of how good Charlo is ? To be fair, all he could do was dominate both like the did, so fair enough, but it doesn't tell us anything about how he would look against decent opposition. He needs to step in with someone in the top 10 before we have any idea of how good he is - even the likes of Lemieux or N'Dam would give us a benchmark, as we can start to compare how he did against how others have done against them.
Right now we remain clueless as to how good he is at 160.Leave a comment:
-
-
I stopped watching the fight after about a minute with the thought 'what the hell is Centeno doing in the ring ?'. It was already clear that he didn't belong in there and just a waste of Charlo's time (except its value as a stay-busy fight) and a waste of our time as there was only going to be one winner, Centeno had as much a chance as Heiland did.
So because Centeno had no better chance than Heiland, is that an indication of how good Charlo is ? To be fair, all he could do was dominate both like the did, so fair enough, but it doesn't tell us anything about how he would look against decent opposition. He needs to step in with someone in the top 10 before we have any idea of how good he is - even the likes of Lemieux or N'Dam would give us a benchmark, as we can start to compare how he did against how others have done against them.
Right now we remain clueless as to how good he is at 160.Leave a comment:
-
Soon as charlo landed a jab on Hugo he wanted nothing to do with him. He's got some scary power and great timing, but I think someone who has good footwork and matches his size and athleticism could bother him a bit. If golovkin ends up fighting Saunders or canelo after vanes I'd love to see him and Jacobs or possibly andrade,Leave a comment:
-
He beats Centeno. Big deal.
I am the only one feeling impatience about these Charlos?Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: