The IBF won't sanction GGG-Vanes. Title will be stripped if the fight proceeds.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #71
    Originally posted by Street15
    SHOULD be. But they decided not to. It's obvious they decided to go against their own rules.
    What i'm reading from Fat Dan and others on Twitter is that the IBF hasn't decided anything yet. Golovkin has to apply for an exception.

    "While Golovkin will defend his WBA and WBC titles in the fight, he faces the prospect of being stripped by the IBF, which deems Martirosyan unworthy of challenging for the title, has declined to sanction the fight, though Loeffler plans to file for an exception, which could be granted."

    http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/i...son-california

    From a story posted 15 mins ago.
    Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 04-18-2018, 11:19 AM.

    Comment

    • Street15
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jun 2017
      • 594
      • 21
      • 3
      • 10,392

      #72
      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
      What i'm reading from Fat Dan and others on Twitter is that the IBF hasn't decided anything yet. Golovkin has to apply for an exception.

      "While Golovkin will defend his WBA and WBC titles in the fight, he faces the prospect of being stripped by the IBF, which deems Martirosyan unworthy of challenging for the title, has declined to sanction the fight, though Loeffler plans to file for an exception, which could be granted."

      http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/i...son-california

      From a story posted 15 mins ago.


      He won't be stripped. But then you'll say "well according to Dan though...."

      I don't want to go back and forth on that. I'm saying he won't be stripped. You're saying he might be. No biggie.

      Either way, the IBF is not on the line. The WBA and WBC are. And we have a fight that not many did not want. Welp. Oh well.

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #73
        Originally posted by Street15
        https://www.cbssports.com/boxing/new...syan-on-may-5/

        He won't be stripped. But then you'll say "well according to Dan though...."

        I don't want to go back and forth on that. I'm saying he won't be stripped. You're saying he might be. No biggie.

        Either way, the IBF is not on the line. The WBA and WBC are. And we have a fight that not many did not want. Welp. Oh well.
        It doesn't say that. Loeffler needs to apply for an exception. Which means the IBF hasn't approved it yet.

        Comment

        • Street15
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jun 2017
          • 594
          • 21
          • 3
          • 10,392

          #74
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
          It doesn't say that. Loeffler needs to apply for an exception. Which means the IBF hasn't approved it yet.
          Nice. Smh. We will see how that plays out.

          Either way, we have a fight on our hands that the majority didn't want.

          Comment

          • BLACK KNOT
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Mar 2018
            • 849
            • 41
            • 3
            • 10,363

            #75
            Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
            What i'm reading from Fat Dan and others on Twitter is that the IBF hasn't decided anything yet. Golovkin has to apply for an exception.

            "While Golovkin will defend his WBA and WBC titles in the fight, he faces the prospect of being stripped by the IBF, which deems Martirosyan unworthy of challenging for the title, has declined to sanction the fight, though Loeffler plans to file for an exception, which could be granted."

            http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/i...son-california

            From a story posted 15 mins ago.
            he aint getting stripped you think the ibf wants to miss out on that ggg vs clenelo rematch money?

            Comment

            • Robbie Barrett
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2013
              • 40891
              • 2,779
              • 667
              • 570,921

              #76
              Originally posted by BLACK KNOT
              he aint getting stripped you think the ibf wants to miss out on that ggg vs clenelo rematch money?
              They stripped Fury when a rematch with Klitschko was set up and ordered Martin-Glazkov instead. They don't always go with the money.

              Comment

              • Street15
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2017
                • 594
                • 21
                • 3
                • 10,392

                #77
                Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                They stripped Fury when a rematch with Klitschko was set up and ordered Martin-Glazkov instead. They don't always go with the money.
                Correct. I hate how rematch clauses can't coincide with sanctioning bodies. It's like 2 different and opposing contracts going up against each other. Only one can prevail.

                Which is why it's sooooo hard to keep multiple belts. The obligations you have are endless.

                Comment

                • Raggamuffin
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2016
                  • 8195
                  • 453
                  • 961
                  • 43,263

                  #78
                  Originally posted by Mammoth
                  http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/23222172/ibf-says-gennady-golovkin-stripped-belt-fights-vanes-martirosyan?platform=amp&__twitter_impression=true

                  Say Fatty Fatty Boombalatty Dan Rafael
                  He’s being stripped because his opponent failed a drug test and he isn’t fighting his mandatory. Lmao... Who would’ve thought that Id be taking up for GG.

                  Comment

                  • Jewish-Reptile
                    COLD HEARTBREAKER
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 10708
                    • 922
                    • 1,095
                    • 15,382

                    #79
                    Originally posted by Mammoth
                    Th title will become vacant if he fights Vanes. I think SD or a unification are about what Golovkin is able to do. Unless the IBF approves somebody else - which I doubt.
                    As I said earlier the ibf wouldn’t strip him they’d just refuse to sanction the fight, it was pretty obvious what would happen.

                    Next up GGG will have to face SD or vacate unless of course he faces BJS, that I’m not expecting as he will expose him before the Clenelo rematch, I’m expecting GGG to face SD, fight in September against the PED cheat then retire before he is ordered to face Charlo I doubt he unifies against BJS either personally.

                    Comment

                    • Mammoth
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2016
                      • 35676
                      • 3,828
                      • 3,378
                      • 378,304

                      #80
                      Originally posted by ScottWeiland
                      As I said earlier the ibf wouldn’t strip him they’d just refuse to sanction the fight, it was pretty obvious what would happen.

                      Next up GGG will have to face SD or vacate unless of course he faces BJS, that I’m not expecting as he will expose him before the Clenelo rematch, I’m expecting GGG to face SD, fight in September against the PED cheat then retire before he is ordered to face Charlo I doubt he unifies against BJS either personally.
                      IBF will force a purse bid next. I'm glad since I don't care for GGG vs Canelo II.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP