Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo, GGG's Options, Hurd, Broner, More

[BigStomps]

maybe so. But if you work for a F A G G and you also have cosmetic surgery then you are likely a F A G G. And if you get caught dirty and have to call on off fight and then get suspended and made into a laughing stock and still ppl are crying and saying "why didnt you tell me earlier" thats just insane

And if your bedroom is full of kids toys and you have a lifetime supply of jolley ranchers like you do then Imma say your a punk ass pedophile and you should be locked up in prison where you belong and have the big boys run a train on your biitch ass!
Now get off my **** punk! You piece of shet child ******er! You deserve to die biitch!

[The D3vil]

The motherfuccer Breadman never said that till someone called him on it! On his last three or four posts he's repeatedly bashed Canelo but has never bashed a black fighter for using PED's.
You still gonna say he's being unbiased?

HE's not bashing Canelo, he's just stating facts that he's being asked about, you dumb nut.

Why would he be bringing up stuff from 2003 or 2011 today, idiot?

And Mayweather never tested positive for anything, regardless of what you assclowns think.

I agree that if Canelo was a black dude from Brooklyn, he would get more "benefit of the doubt" from all those guys and the medias like Dontay BN, TMT channel or Egos. And I'm a GGG supporter.

I never heard so much "I kew he was a cheater" talk on Peterson, Berto, Mosley or Roy, they get a really nice pass from the media is you ask me. they are just trying to throw Canelo's career under the bus.

Boxing is a tribal sport and many afro americans seem to be very tribal guys (not all of them of course). They are consistently discrediting non black fighters Pacquiao, Loma, Canelo, GGG, Klit bros, chocolatito...bashing them when they lose, talking down any of their wins. That's more than a trend on youtube or NSB.

Breadman knows it but won't say it otherwise would be called an uncle Tom for the rest of his career.
That being said, BREADMAN doesn't fit this criteria AT ALL, he's probably the most unbiased and sensitive cat in the game.

I don't care what colour is the guy and Breadman is just a great read to have.

This is a dumb post.

Do you have proof of what Breadman was saying in 2003 or 2011 when these people were testing positive?

How many people were speculating about ****ing Peterson or other fighters?

Face it, Canelo's the biggest fighter in boxing so of course there's going to be more speculation about what he's doing especially when his body is changing like it has.

Same thing happened with Mayweather, but the difference is that there's no positive test, just like with the Charlos, whom Bread has spent months sending subliminal shots at for being PED users.

He's already said that he's not going to just call anybody out without proof.

Well with Canelo, he has proof in 2018, not 2003, or 2007, or 2011. TODAY

I understand what your saying but in the past Breadman has said that if you accuse someone of being on PED's then yes, you can get sued.
But if you say you suspect of someone being on PED's then you can't get sued for that. There's a difference. So why didn't he say it before that he suspected Canelo of using PED's?
Why not drop a list of all the fighters he suspects of using PED's? He can't get sued for it so why is he afraid??
The way I see it is if he didn't speak on it before Canelo got popped for PED's then why speak on it now? Why say he always knew Canelo was on PED's?
He doesn't go out of his way to bash black fighters but he does Canelo.
That's weak in my opinion

Because you can't just randomly accuse people, idiot.

He wasn't randomly accusing Canelo. Canelo flunked a test.

If Bread had his su****ions, he kept them secret until after the test results, which is how you're supposed to do that.

Only random idiots on the internet want him to throw himself out the window by accusing random people of being loaded without proof.

Breadman himself has said that if you speak up and accuse someone of being on PED's then yes, You can get sued. But if you say you SUSPECT then your safe. You just gotta choose your words carefully.
So why don't he drop a list of fighters he suspects of being on PED's??
It's a big difference.
For example.. If I tell people your a F A G G cause you love wearing skinny jeans and you have a pony tail are they gonna believe me? Probably not....
But if I tell them that you ****** my **** are they gonna believe your a F A G G?? Most likely. There's a difference. He just gotta choose his words carefully .

Dude, you can't just say "suspect".

Bread didn't say he "suspected" Canelo of anything until he had already flunked a test, did he?

Of course you'd be reckless enough to just randomly attack people and probably get some wrong.

Bread is a trainer with ranked fighters, just randomly accusing fighters of being dirty would probably not just hurt his career, but those of J-Rock and other guys he trains.

He did the right thing.

He keeps his su****ions to himself until there is EVIDENCE.

[aboutfkntime]

I can't believe some of the stuff that a knowledgeable guy like breadman says about Golovkin

how could anyone possibly believe that "duckin me doe" bullshht..... when Golovkin has refused/avoided MUCH better opponents

how could anyone still believe that "anyone from 154-168" bull****..... when Golovkin has killed at least THREE HUGE fights over weight

how could anyone still believe it is a coincidence that Team Bullshht have completely avoided mover/spoilers, preferring to select opponents who are "available"

breadman, whilst being very knowledgeable..... is capable of being ****** in, just like everyone else

[BillyBoxing]

I respect what you gotta say even though we don't agree on all topics.
You seem to know what you're talking about not like most of these PED experts on here.

The thing is this bro, Nelo always struggled to make 154 younger, hence the Caneloweight.

Then he ballooned to 165 to fight Chavez, 180 lbs on fight night, Canelo probably walk around 190 at this point.

Then he get caught with Clembuterol wich cutt fat and enhance stamina when we know Canelo always struggled to make weight and his stamina sucks.

I don't believe the meat stuff, and if it's the case, then there are fckin dumba$$es, he needs to fire half of his team.

[daggum]

I can't believe some of the stuff that a knowledgeable guy like breadman says about Golovkin

how could anyone possibly believe that "duckin me doe" bullshht..... when Golovkin has refused/avoided MUCH better opponents

how could anyone still believe that "anyone from 154-168" bull****..... when Golovkin has killed at least THREE HUGE fights over weight

how could anyone still believe it is a coincidence that Team Bullshht have completely avoided mover/spoilers, preferring to select opponents who are "available"

breadman, whilst being very knowledgeable..... is capable of being ****** in, just like everyone else

yes he ducked all the crappy fighters to fight the top 3 guys in his division. stellar argument. strange how saunders who said he didn't want to fight ggg is now the guy being ducked because ggg fought canelo first lmao. im glad you dont manage fighters. fight the unknown guy for 2 million instead of the champ for 20! great advice

[BillyBoxing]

This is a dumb post.

Do you have proof of what Breadman was saying in 2003 or 2011 when these people were testing positive?

How many people were speculating about ****ing Peterson or other fighters?

Face it, Canelo's the biggest fighter in boxing so of course there's going to be more speculation about what he's doing especially when his body is changing like it has.

Same thing happened with Mayweather, but the difference is that there's no positive test, just like with the Charlos, whom Bread has spent months sending subliminal shots at for being PED users.

He's already said that he's not going to just call anybody out without proof.

Well with Canelo, he has proof in 2018, not 2003, or 2007, or 2011. TODAY

Not fitting you agenda doesn't mean dumb.

Especially since I never said anything about Breadman bashing Canelo. I said Breadman is my boy and a fair dude.

I wrote:
"I never heard so much "I kew he was a cheater" talk on Peterson, Berto, Mosley or Roy, they get a really nice pass from the media is you ask me. they are just trying to throw Canelo's career under the bus."

I said the media, and a certain type of media(Donta BN, Egos, TMT channel), not Breadman.

[HAY-B]

Well to be honest I've only been reading Bread's mailbags for like a year and a half. I used to think he was unbiased and I thought he kept it fair.
But when he said he always knew Canelo was on PED's well I thought that's bullshet! Why speak on it now? He should of said that before.
I just think he's going out of his way to bash Canelo. Now I'm not defending Canelo cause I think the motherfuccer cheated.
But I've never seen him bash a black fighter the way he's bashing Canelo.
So if he's gonna be a reporter then keep it real and don't be biased towards anyone.

Go to ********** and see if they have his mailbag in their archive. If they due just review the ones related to FMJ vs PAC and then ask about him bashing black fighters, black trainers, but mainly the Mayweathers. I mean at times after reading some of his opinions about them and related to them his persective seemed personal . Like as if one of them screwed his baby mama and sent him a link to the video.

[HAY-B]

I think your confusing BM for Dougie Fish???

Nah. I don't read DF

[BigStomps]

HE's not bashing Canelo, he's just stating facts that he's being asked about, you dumb nut.

Why would he be bringing up stuff from 2003 or 2011 today, idiot?

And Mayweather never tested positive for anything, regardless of what you assclowns think.



This is a dumb post.

Do you have proof of what Breadman was saying in 2003 or 2011 when these people were testing positive?

How many people were speculating about ****ing Peterson or other fighters?

Face it, Canelo's the biggest fighter in boxing so of course there's going to be more speculation about what he's doing especially when his body is changing like it has.

Same thing happened with Mayweather, but the difference is that there's no positive test, just like with the Charlos, whom Bread has spent months sending subliminal shots at for being PED users.

He's already said that he's not going to just call anybody out without proof.

Well with Canelo, he has proof in 2018, not 2003, or 2007, or 2011. TODAY



Because you can't just randomly accuse people, idiot.

He wasn't randomly accusing Canelo. Canelo flunked a test.

If Bread had his su****ions, he kept them secret until after the test results, which is how you're supposed to do that.

Only random idiots on the internet want him to throw himself out the window by accusing random people of being loaded without proof.




Dude, you can't just say "suspect".

Bread didn't say he "suspected" Canelo of anything until he had already flunked a test, did he?

Of course you'd be reckless enough to just randomly attack people and probably get some wrong.

Bread is a trainer with ranked fighters, just randomly accusing fighters of being dirty would probably not just hurt his career, but those of J-Rock and other guys he trains.

He did the right thing.

He keeps his su****ions to himself until there is EVIDENCE.

Look biitch! I'm a man and if I got something to say Imma say it! Fucc whoever gets offended! If there's a problem we can deal with it!
Little punk biitches like you and bread wanna keep things to yourself and not speak up till after the facts are out.
That's some straight biitch shet!
Do you know the difference between accuse and suspect you ****** motherfuccer??
He can always say he suspects someone is on PED's and not get sued.
You're obviously too ****** to comprehend what I'm saying so just stay off my **** biitch and don't bother replying! I'm tired of telling all you ****** motherfuccers the difference between accusing and suspecting!

[BillyBoxing]

yes he ducked all the crappy fighters to fight the top 3 guys in his division. stellar argument. strange how saunders who said he didn't want to fight ggg is now the guy being ducked because ggg fought canelo first lmao. im glad you dont manage fighters. fight the unknown guy for 2 million instead of the champ for 20! great advice

DAG, I mean, aboutfucckinbum, let's talk about THIS GUY, RIGHT
NOW
I'm surprised you don't have this complete insane individual on ignore just like me, and believe me or not, he's the only guy I ever put on ignore on this website.

let's me get this straight, I have never seen on NSB such an active detractor.

He's like a negative Larry or Tunney, so even worse lol. At least Larry and Tunney love their heroes.

The man is in every thread related to GGG bashing him. I have never seen him in another thread (about WW or HW)

I mean, that's just crazy. How sad is this man's life?

GGG just fought the 2 (others) best guys in his division in Jacobs and Nelo, there is no reason to utterly bash him unless you got some serious issues.

I mean, that man is fckin crazy, think about it.

I can't imagine how you can dislike that much a man that you don't even know...just because he didn't fight that guy...or said 154 to 168.

The MAN is NUTS, think about it, I didn't know this could exist LOL

This man need to hire a psy.

He's probably an alt.