Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: Jorge Linares is a Very Dangerous Fight For Me

[chrisJS]

I'm a Loma fan, too, and don't really hold that Salido loss much against him. He's one of the current fighters that I could call "great" without any hesitation. I never use that title for many fighters.

However, when people try to justify it to the point of fanboyism, I disagree and point out that it was a legitimate loss, which would never disappear, no matter how hard they try to wish it away.

You don't think Salido skipping weight and throwing and landing an obscene amount of low blows in a 6-6 type fight played any kind of factor?

So you say Loma is great but that Davis would beat him easily? Then you call people fanboys. Davis is solid but that's about it there's not a hint of greatness shown to date. Hes more Broner or Lacy than Loma or Crawford.

[4truth]

Like GGG? No, I don't like that at all.

then the only constant in your opinion appears to be unrelated to boxing or am missing something?

[BoxingIsGreat]

You don't think Salido skipping weight and throwing and landing an obscene amount of low blows in a 6-6 type fight played any kind of factor?

So you say Loma is great but that Davis would beat him easily? Then you call people fanboys. Davis is solid but that's about it there's not a hint of greatness shown to date. Hes more Broner or Lacy than Loma or Crawford.

Bold 1: All excuses. Facts are Salido 1-0 Loma.

Bold 2: Why are you lying? Where did I say "easily"? If you can't show me that, don't bother to reply. I said if Loma stands toe to toe with Davis, he'd kiss the canvas.

Again, if I didn't believe in Davis, I wouldn't have him in my avatar. I'm his fan, not a fanboy. I know Zero about him outside the ring and don't use social media or follow him.

If you can't see Davis is special in the ring, then that shows your bias. Broner and Lacy? Take off your blinds and stop hating.

[BoxingIsGreat]

then the only constant in your opinion appears to be unrelated to boxing or am missing something?

I don't get you. What are you saying?

You think GGG hasn't been babied opponent wise until his epic struggles with Jacobs and Canelo (two B range fighters)?

[chrisJS]

Bold 1: All excuses. Facts are Salido 1-0 Loma.

Bold 2: Why are you lying? Where did I say "easily"? If you can't show me that, don't bother to reply. I said if Loma stands toe to toe with Davis, he'd kiss the canvas.

Again, if I didn't believe in Davis, I wouldn't have him in my avatar. I'm his fan, not a fanboy. I know Zero about him outside the ring and don't use social media or follow him.

If you can't see Davis is special in the ring, then that shows your bias. Broner and Lacy? Take off your blinds and stop hating.

Some losses and results don't necessarily tell a full story. Did Whitaker really lose to Ramirez and not beat Chavez? Was Lewis-Holyfield I really a draw? Did Williams really beat Lara?

You don't seem to give Lomachenko much or any chance of beating Davis. That suggests you think it would be easy.

[Raggamuffin]

Some losses and results don't necessarily tell a full story. Did Whitaker really lose to Ramirez and not beat Chavez? Was Lewis-Holyfield I really a draw? Did Williams really beat Lara?

You don't seem to give Lomachenko much or any chance of beating Davis. That suggests you think it would be easy.

Yeah but you don't give Davis a chance against Loma so what's your point? He likes Davis so you have to live with that. You'll probably say that when Davis loses......he will be off his bandwagon, lmao.

[chrisJS]

Yeah but you don't give Davis a chance against Loma so what's your point? He likes Davis so you have to live with that. You'll probably say that when Davis loses......he will be off his bandwagon, lmao.

Davis has next to no chance. He would be a huge underdog and doesn't have an edge in skill or experience. My point is that he says Loma is a great fighter so he surely seems to think Davis is already which is crazy talk IMO and I'm sure in just about anybody else's opinion.

[Raggamuffin]

Davis has next to no chance. He would be a huge underdog and doesn't have an edge in skill or experience. My point is that he says Loma is a great fighter so he surely seems to think Davis is already which is crazy talk IMO and I'm sure in just about anybody else's opinion.

Ok, so you gave your opinion and I have to respect that. But you're not respecting his opinion. You're not accepting the fact that he thinks that Davis will beat Loma.

[BoxingIsGreat]

Some losses and results don't necessarily tell a full story. Did Whitaker really lose to Ramirez and not beat Chavez? Was Lewis-Holyfield I really a draw? Did Williams really beat Lara?

You don't seem to give Lomachenko much or any chance of beating Davis. That suggests you think it would be easy.

I like them both. I'm sure you have two fighters you like a lot but, on the night, you root for one. I'll root for Loma against anyone he fights, including his next fight with Linares, but when he fights Davis, I'll go for Davis.

Most people on this site give Davis zero chance against Loma, I don't see it that way at all. It's my opinion.

Where I'm concerned, when it comes to Loma, people are barking at the wrong tree.

[BoxingIsGreat]

Davis has next to no chance. He would be a huge underdog and doesn't have an edge in skill or experience. My point is that he says Loma is a great fighter so he surely seems to think Davis is already which is crazy talk IMO and I'm sure in just about anybody else's opinion.

He has edge in youth, strength, punching power with both hands, and solid chin. Loma hasn't been with anyone like Davis in the pros. Open your eyes man.

You saw what crude Hurd did to Lara, when Lara stood his ground. Toe to toe, Davis will stretch Loma. I've no doubt about that.