How long can Canelo go on with this fiasco?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • icha
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2013
    • 9516
    • 330
    • 370
    • 78,629

    #41
    Originally posted by Teetotaler
    Lmfao @ the second row of names.
    Three fighters with better resume? Loma, thurman, crawford
    thurman?? wtf... anyways none of the guys you mention on your post..
    your crying at the wrong guy...

    Comment

    • The plunger man
      the minge monster
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2014
      • 9139
      • 1,021
      • 263
      • 67,551

      #42
      Originally posted by Teetotaler
      It's obvious that i hate runelo as much as the next guy but eventually people will begin to dislike/hate him.
      Lets say he fights Golovkin in September and wins decisively (ko). How long till he'll fight a challenge again?
      In my opinion i know that jacobs and Blow job saunders will clown him easily. He likes when they come at him but bumnelo is garbage going forward/aggressor. Aside from them what about Andrade, charlo or GGG's ibf mandatory (idk his name)? Those are fights he'd literally all lose. And if he somehow makes it a somewhat close fight then for sure hed get the win. Hes still young too so he can be around for a while. Is that why he said earlier that he might retire early? In an event like this?

      Your thoughts?
      bumnelo lmao

      Comment

      • Illmatic94
        Undisputed Champion
        • Oct 2015
        • 3955
        • 235
        • 14
        • 32,550

        #43
        Originally posted by Teetotaler
        Lmfao @ the second row of names.
        Three fighters with better resume? Loma, thurman, crawford
        Thurman? there you show bias. Both of Thurman's big wins against DSG and Porter were razor thin and debateable. Yet you say he won them both. But EVERY single close fight Canelo is in you say he lost. Honestly there is nothing to debate in his wins over Cotto, Trout and Lara as he won them all clear to me. The only debatable fight was vs GGG.

        Loma doesn't have a win bigger than Canelo over Lara. His win vs Rigo comes with asterisk. Guy moving up two divisions and inactive. Floyd gets almost no credit for beating Marquez even though it was Floyd the one coming off inactivity and Marquez was top three Pound for Pound. Even Loma himself knows that win is tainted as he himself said it post fight.

        Crawford? what win does he have bigger than Canelo over Cotto, Lara and Trout?

        Back to your original post I think Canelo would fold Charlo in half and knock him out. Charlo was getting tagged way too much vs Trout.

        Canelo whoops BJS too. People think because he outboxed Lemule that he's elite smh. That must mean Lemule was elite as well since beating him means so much.

        The only debatable matchup is Jacobs vs Canelo and that's the most intriguing.

        Comment

        • Teetotaler
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2014
          • 8434
          • 274
          • 404
          • 18,146

          #44
          Originally posted by Illmatic94
          Thurman? there you show bias. Both of Thurman's big wins against DSG and Porter were razor thin and debateable. Yet you say he won them both. But EVERY single close fight Canelo is in you say he lost. Honestly there is nothing to debate in his wins over Cotto, Trout and Lara as he won them all clear to me. The only debatable fight was vs GGG.

          Loma doesn't have a win bigger than Canelo over Lara. His win vs Rigo comes with asterisk. Guy moving up two divisions and inactive. Floyd gets almost no credit for beating Marquez even though it was Floyd the one coming off inactivity and Marquez was top three Pound for Pound. Even Loma himself knows that win is tainted as he himself said it post fight.

          Crawford? what win does he have bigger than Canelo over Cotto, Lara and Trout?

          Back to your original post I think Canelo would fold Charlo in half and knock him out. Charlo was getting tagged way too much vs Trout.

          Canelo whoops BJS too. People think because he outboxed Lemule that he's elite smh. That must mean Lemule was elite as well since beating him means so much.

          The only debatable matchup is Jacobs vs Canelo and that's the most intriguing.
          Razor thin? Thurman won clearly. Close fights but the winner was clear. People need to stop mentioning cotto! He was ****ing old. Geezus you guys mention him like he was an undefeated prime fighter. Might as well bring up oldass mosley and baldimor.
          Bumnelo literally has the same skills as lemuiex when it comes to cutting off the ring. Bjs would do the exact same thing. But im sure gb wouldn't make the same mistake and have it be a punchers ring. Even then how long till runelo fights one of those guys? Lmfao you guys keep bringing up lara and trout and how many ****ing years ago were those fights?

          Comment

          • lex_fugitive
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 388
            • 21
            • 12
            • 6,622

            #45
            Originally posted by Teetotaler
            Lmfao @ the second row of names.
            Three fighters with better resume? Loma, thurman, crawford
            Thurman, Crawford???


            Really? Yep, Indongo and Postol and Lundy are better than Lara, Floyd, and g. lmao.

            Yes, that second row, is funny. It is funny because everyone one of those fighters is better than everyone g has fought except his last two opponents. As for Bud, get outta here. You must be a newbie.

            Loma? If we are talking amateur careers to, then he might. As a pro, not so much.

            You literally just said Postol and Jean and Dulorme are better than Floyd, Cotto, G, Lara, and Trout in his prime, as the #1 jmw. Thurman has two decent opponents. No one else he has fought is even comparable to the laughable second-tier Canelo has.

            By the way, Bud is 30. The names he has fought???? NONE. ZIP. ZELCH. NADA. Postol and Indongo are no ones.

            I just spanked you. I almost feel bad. I get it, you have heard a few names of boxers and just get on and speak nonsense, being a troll. Ok, I will leave you alone in your own little world, where Floyd Mayweather, a prime Austin Trout, Lara, Cotto, and G are no ones and make for a terrible resume for a 27-YEAR OLD.

            Comment

            • Teetotaler
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2014
              • 8434
              • 274
              • 404
              • 18,146

              #46
              Originally posted by lex_fugitive
              Thurman, Crawford???


              Really? Yep, Indongo and Postol and Lundy are better than Lara, Floyd, and g. lmao.

              Yes, that second row, is funny. It is funny because everyone one of those fighters is better than everyone g has fought except his last two opponents. As for Bud, get outta here. You must be a newbie.

              Loma? If we are talking amateur careers to, then he might. As a pro, not so much.

              You literally just said Postol and Jean and Dulorme are better than Floyd, Cotto, G, Lara, and Trout in his prime, as the #1 jmw. Thurman has two decent opponents. No one else he has fought is even comparable to the laughable second-tier Canelo has.

              By the way, Bud is 30. The names he has fought???? NONE. ZIP. ZELCH. NADA. Postol and Indongo are no ones.

              I just spanked you. I almost feel bad. I get it, you have heard a few names of boxers and just get on and speak nonsense, being a troll. Ok, I will leave you alone in your own little world, where Floyd Mayweather, a prime Austin Trout, Lara, Cotto, and G are no ones and make for a terrible resume for a 27-YEAR OLD.
              Why are you mentioning floyd? Floyd ****ing humiliated that bum. Dude cotto was old as ****. Why do u guys keep bringing up that win like its some great ****ing victory? The fact you think bumnelo has a better resume than loma shows how ****** you are. Lmfao how long are u guys gonna live off those fight against lara and trout? They were over 5 ****ing years ago
              Oh and thanks for the PM ******

              Comment

              • lex_fugitive
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Mar 2010
                • 388
                • 21
                • 12
                • 6,622

                #47
                Originally posted by Teetotaler
                Why are you mentioning floyd? Floyd ****ing humiliated that bum. Dude cotto was old as ****. Why do u guys keep bringing up that win like its some great ****ing victory? The fact you think bumnelo has a better resume than loma shows how ****** you are. Lmfao how long are u guys gonna live off those fight against lara and trout? They were over 5 ****ing years ago
                Oh and thanks for the PM ******
                These are the guys Canelo has fought, the chances he has taken:

                Floyd Mayweather Jr. (GOAT), Austin Trout (consensus #1 jmw), Lara (consensus #1 jmw), Cotto (WBC mw champ), and g (consensus #1 mw.)


                That's worse resume than Indongo and Postol? Or DSG and Porter, and no one else? A 36 year old two divisions lower and Walters? Ok.

                Comment

                • Teetotaler
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2014
                  • 8434
                  • 274
                  • 404
                  • 18,146

                  #48
                  Originally posted by lex_fugitive
                  These are the guys Canelo has fought, the chances he has taken:

                  Floyd Mayweather Jr. (GOAT), Austin Trout (consensus #1 jmw), Lara (consensus #1 jmw), Cotto (WBC mw champ), and g (consensus #1 mw.)


                  That's worse resume than Indongo and Postol? Or DSG and Porter, and no one else? A 36 year old two divisions lower and Walters? Ok.

                  So a guy who was pro since he was 17 with over 45 fights and you can only give 5 good names on a resume. One of which was way past prime, got humiliated in one and should have lost the other!? Lmfao


                  Edit: should have lost two lmao
                  Last edited by Teetotaler; 04-16-2018, 06:57 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Teetotaler
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2014
                    • 8434
                    • 274
                    • 404
                    • 18,146

                    #49
                    Originally posted by lex_fugitive
                    These are the guys Canelo has fought, the chances he has taken:

                    Floyd Mayweather Jr. (GOAT), Austin Trout (consensus #1 jmw), Lara (consensus #1 jmw), Cotto (WBC mw champ), and g (consensus #1 mw.)


                    That's worse resume than Indongo and Postol? Or DSG and Porter, and no one else? A 36 year old two divisions lower and Walters? Ok.

                    What did you say in the PM you sent me? "I own you. Call me daddy" i guess yoi can call me that now phaggot

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP