How long can Canelo go on with this fiasco?
Collapse
-
bumnelo lmaoIt's obvious that i hate runelo as much as the next guy but eventually people will begin to dislike/hate him.
Lets say he fights Golovkin in September and wins decisively (ko). How long till he'll fight a challenge again?
In my opinion i know that jacobs and Blow job saunders will clown him easily. He likes when they come at him but bumnelo is garbage going forward/aggressor. Aside from them what about Andrade, charlo or GGG's ibf mandatory (idk his name)? Those are fights he'd literally all lose. And if he somehow makes it a somewhat close fight then for sure hed get the win. Hes still young too so he can be around for a while. Is that why he said earlier that he might retire early? In an event like this?
Your thoughts?Comment
-
Thurman? there you show bias. Both of Thurman's big wins against DSG and Porter were razor thin and debateable. Yet you say he won them both. But EVERY single close fight Canelo is in you say he lost. Honestly there is nothing to debate in his wins over Cotto, Trout and Lara as he won them all clear to me. The only debatable fight was vs GGG.
Loma doesn't have a win bigger than Canelo over Lara. His win vs Rigo comes with asterisk. Guy moving up two divisions and inactive. Floyd gets almost no credit for beating Marquez even though it was Floyd the one coming off inactivity and Marquez was top three Pound for Pound. Even Loma himself knows that win is tainted as he himself said it post fight.
Crawford? what win does he have bigger than Canelo over Cotto, Lara and Trout?
Back to your original post I think Canelo would fold Charlo in half and knock him out. Charlo was getting tagged way too much vs Trout.
Canelo whoops BJS too. People think because he outboxed Lemule that he's elite smh. That must mean Lemule was elite as well since beating him means so much.
The only debatable matchup is Jacobs vs Canelo and that's the most intriguing.Comment
-
Razor thin? Thurman won clearly. Close fights but the winner was clear. People need to stop mentioning cotto! He was ****ing old. Geezus you guys mention him like he was an undefeated prime fighter. Might as well bring up oldass mosley and baldimor.Thurman? there you show bias. Both of Thurman's big wins against DSG and Porter were razor thin and debateable. Yet you say he won them both. But EVERY single close fight Canelo is in you say he lost. Honestly there is nothing to debate in his wins over Cotto, Trout and Lara as he won them all clear to me. The only debatable fight was vs GGG.
Loma doesn't have a win bigger than Canelo over Lara. His win vs Rigo comes with asterisk. Guy moving up two divisions and inactive. Floyd gets almost no credit for beating Marquez even though it was Floyd the one coming off inactivity and Marquez was top three Pound for Pound. Even Loma himself knows that win is tainted as he himself said it post fight.
Crawford? what win does he have bigger than Canelo over Cotto, Lara and Trout?
Back to your original post I think Canelo would fold Charlo in half and knock him out. Charlo was getting tagged way too much vs Trout.
Canelo whoops BJS too. People think because he outboxed Lemule that he's elite smh. That must mean Lemule was elite as well since beating him means so much.
The only debatable matchup is Jacobs vs Canelo and that's the most intriguing.
Bumnelo literally has the same skills as lemuiex when it comes to cutting off the ring. Bjs would do the exact same thing. But im sure gb wouldn't make the same mistake and have it be a punchers ring. Even then how long till runelo fights one of those guys? Lmfao you guys keep bringing up lara and trout and how many ****ing years ago were those fights?Comment
-
Thurman, Crawford???

Really? Yep, Indongo and Postol and Lundy are better than Lara, Floyd, and g. lmao.
Yes, that second row, is funny. It is funny because everyone one of those fighters is better than everyone g has fought except his last two opponents. As for Bud, get outta here. You must be a newbie.
Loma? If we are talking amateur careers to, then he might. As a pro, not so much.
You literally just said Postol and Jean and Dulorme are better than Floyd, Cotto, G, Lara, and Trout in his prime, as the #1 jmw. Thurman has two decent opponents. No one else he has fought is even comparable to the laughable second-tier Canelo has.
By the way, Bud is 30. The names he has fought???? NONE. ZIP. ZELCH. NADA. Postol and Indongo are no ones.
I just spanked you. I almost feel bad. I get it, you have heard a few names of boxers and just get on and speak nonsense, being a troll. Ok, I will leave you alone in your own little world, where Floyd Mayweather, a prime Austin Trout, Lara, Cotto, and G are no ones and make for a terrible resume for a 27-YEAR OLD.
Comment
-
Why are you mentioning floyd? Floyd ****ing humiliated that bum. Dude cotto was old as ****. Why do u guys keep bringing up that win like its some great ****ing victory? The fact you think bumnelo has a better resume than loma shows how ****** you are. Lmfao how long are u guys gonna live off those fight against lara and trout? They were over 5 ****ing years agoThurman, Crawford???

Really? Yep, Indongo and Postol and Lundy are better than Lara, Floyd, and g. lmao.
Yes, that second row, is funny. It is funny because everyone one of those fighters is better than everyone g has fought except his last two opponents. As for Bud, get outta here. You must be a newbie.
Loma? If we are talking amateur careers to, then he might. As a pro, not so much.
You literally just said Postol and Jean and Dulorme are better than Floyd, Cotto, G, Lara, and Trout in his prime, as the #1 jmw. Thurman has two decent opponents. No one else he has fought is even comparable to the laughable second-tier Canelo has.
By the way, Bud is 30. The names he has fought???? NONE. ZIP. ZELCH. NADA. Postol and Indongo are no ones.
I just spanked you. I almost feel bad. I get it, you have heard a few names of boxers and just get on and speak nonsense, being a troll. Ok, I will leave you alone in your own little world, where Floyd Mayweather, a prime Austin Trout, Lara, Cotto, and G are no ones and make for a terrible resume for a 27-YEAR OLD.


Oh and thanks for the PM ******Comment
-
These are the guys Canelo has fought, the chances he has taken:Why are you mentioning floyd? Floyd ****ing humiliated that bum. Dude cotto was old as ****. Why do u guys keep bringing up that win like its some great ****ing victory? The fact you think bumnelo has a better resume than loma shows how ****** you are. Lmfao how long are u guys gonna live off those fight against lara and trout? They were over 5 ****ing years ago
Oh and thanks for the PM ******
Floyd Mayweather Jr. (GOAT), Austin Trout (consensus #1 jmw), Lara (consensus #1 jmw), Cotto (WBC mw champ), and g (consensus #1 mw.)
That's worse resume than Indongo and Postol? Or DSG and Porter, and no one else? A 36 year old two divisions lower and Walters? Ok.
Comment
-
So a guy who was pro since he was 17 with over 45 fights and you can only give 5 good names on a resume. One of which was way past prime, got humiliated in one and should have lost the other!? LmfaoThese are the guys Canelo has fought, the chances he has taken:
Floyd Mayweather Jr. (GOAT), Austin Trout (consensus #1 jmw), Lara (consensus #1 jmw), Cotto (WBC mw champ), and g (consensus #1 mw.)
That's worse resume than Indongo and Postol? Or DSG and Porter, and no one else? A 36 year old two divisions lower and Walters? Ok.

Edit: should have lost two lmaoLast edited by Teetotaler; 04-16-2018, 06:57 PM.Comment
-
What did you say in the PM you sent me? "I own you. Call me daddy"These are the guys Canelo has fought, the chances he has taken:
Floyd Mayweather Jr. (GOAT), Austin Trout (consensus #1 jmw), Lara (consensus #1 jmw), Cotto (WBC mw champ), and g (consensus #1 mw.)
That's worse resume than Indongo and Postol? Or DSG and Porter, and no one else? A 36 year old two divisions lower and Walters? Ok.

i guess yoi can call me that now phaggot
Comment
Comment