IBF should have been more proactive in this GGG fiasco?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
From my understanding, all three sanctioning bodies for the belts g holds, needs to accept or deny any opponent for those belts. It appears at this time, that the IBF has not decided if they will enforce their rules and mandate G fight Derevyanchenko before any optional. For g to sign a contract to fight someone else, he needs the blessing of the IBF. That is why a contract with Martirosyan has not been signed. The ibf said no.I'm baffled by a statement from Dibella, saying that if GGG vs Martirosyan is finalised, the IBF will strip GGG of their title.
How can a champion be stripped for not fighting his mando, if he hasn't been formally ordered to do it? And the IBF can't order GGG to fight his mando next if he's already signed a contract to fight someone else.
Is it possible that the IBF might have ordered GGG to fight Derevyanchenko without announcing it to anyone?
Apparently they have not confirmed if they will allow anyone besides Derevyanchenko to be g's next opponent or not. And without their consent, their is no fight, so no signed contracts. I'm not sure if the IBF turned down Vanes, because he is such a weak opponent, or if they are just waiting to decide if they are going to enforce Derevyanchenko as mandatory and G's next opponent.Comment
-
As GGG was given a pass on his IBF mando so he could fight either Canelo (already ordered by the WBC) or BJS (unification) I would say that signing to fight somebody other than Canelo or BJS would put him in breach of the IBF's rules on mandos and they would be entitled to strip him immediately.
I guess Connolly is lobbying for the IBF to enforce their rules strictly.Comment
-
Yeah, that makes sense.From my understanding, all three sanctioning bodies for the belts g holds, needs to accept or deny any opponent for those belts. It appears at this time, that the IBF has not decided if they will enforce their rules and mandate G fight Derevyanchenko before any optional. For g to sign a contract to fight someone else, he needs the blessing of the IBF. That is why a contract with Martirosyan has not been signed. The ibf said no.
Apparently they have not confirmed if they will allow anyone besides Derevyanchenko to be g's next opponent or not. And without their consent, their is no fight, so no signed contracts. I'm not sure if the IBF turned down Vanes, because he is such a weak opponent, or if they are just waiting to decide if they are going to enforce Derevyanchenko as mandatory and G's next opponent.
See the comment posted in another thread that I just quoted here. Technically, the IBF have already ordered GGG to fight Derevyanchenko next, if he doesn't fight either Canelo or BJS. So they could strip him immediately if he signed with Martirosyan.Comment
-
Yeah. That's what it is. It looks as though the IBF are willing to let it slide. They want to make sure they OFFICIALLY mandate itAs GGG was given a pass on his IBF mando so he could fight either Canelo (already ordered by the WBC) or BJS (unification) I would say that signing to fight somebody other than Canelo or BJS would put him in breach of the IBF's rules on mandos and they would be entitled to strip him immediately.
I guess Connolly is lobbying for the IBF to enforce their rules strictly.Comment
-
Yeah. They called for it. But they have to enforce and announce it in order for it to be official.Yeah, that makes sense.
See the comment posted in another thread that I just quoted here. Technically, the IBF have already ordered GGG to fight Derevyanchenko next, if he doesn't fight either Canelo or BJS. So they could strip him immediately if he signed with Martirosyan.
Any sanction can call for a fighter to fight someone next, they have to order AND enforce it though. Normally that comes with "fighter a has to start negotations with fighter b by (specific date) or it will go to a purse bid".Comment
Comment