Will GGG retire w/o signature win?
Collapse
-
-
Had the judges agreed with the number of people who saw the first fight for Golovkin, then maybe we wouldn't be having an immediate rematch (except for the money right). Take care of a mandatory and then Saunders possibly, and then I want to see Canelo vs the winner of Charlo vs Jacobs to test his toughness at 160. Then after all that GGG Canelo II if they are the last two standing.Comment
-
Not really, you don’t and I don’t. Ali lost 2 of 3 to Norton and was 0-1 to Jimmy Young. The only important opinions on these matters are of those who have seen those fights. Golovkin bested Canelo in a fight that was not as close as Golovkin’s win over Jacobs.Comment
-
Oh give it up, I never said the guy had 2 KO losses, I just said it was funny... trying to hype gaynaddy gay 97k... just move on and get over itComment
-
Most viewers thought he beat Canelo and he is the betting favorite to win the rematch. He can only fight the boxers who agree to fight him and in the past some top guys wouldn't fight him. Now Saunders is finally willing to fight him as is Jermall. If he beats them those would be good wins. I don't know if they meet your standard of signature wins.Comment
-
No but the guy you quoted said that, and you never corrected it.
You could have, but you didn't. Instead you agreed with it, instead of correcting it.
Why didn't you correct it?
Did you forget?
Did you intend not to?
You had amble opportunity to correct what he said, but you never did. Instead you called someone else's post "misinformation" when you in fact did help spread misinformation by not only not correcting the post, but actually agreeing with it.
How the fúck can you not see this?
Are you really this dense?
You helped spread the lie of Lemiuex being KO'd twice, prior to the GGG fight.
You knew better, right? Yet you didn't correct him. Why?Comment
-
Seriously... you're terrible at this.No but the guy you quoted said that, and you never corrected it.
You could have, but you didn't. Instead you agreed with it, instead of correcting it.
Why didn't you correct it?
Did you forget?
Did you intend not to?
You had amble opportunity to correct what he said, but you never did. Instead you called someone else's post "misinformation" when you in fact did help spread misinformation by not only not correcting the post, but actually agreeing with it.
How the fúck can you not see this?
Are you really this dense?
You helped spread the lie of Lemiuex being KO'd twice, prior to the GGG fight.
You knew better, right? Yet you didn't correct him. Why?
Why?
Why?
Why?
Why?
See... I can do it too. I don't care if lemieux was overrated and gaynaddy gay 97k calls that a great win... or his fans. It shut everyone up when Saunders fucking schooled him and all lemieux could do was make excuses... I'll bet you were all over 97k's knob after he beat what's a circle weren't you?Comment
-
So is Andrade and RamirezMost viewers thought he beat Canelo and he is the betting favorite to win the rematch. He can only fight the boxers who agree to fight him and in the past some top guys wouldn't fight him. Now Saunders is finally willing to fight him as is Jermall. If he beats them those would be good wins. I don't know if they meet your standard of signature wins.Comment
-
Why didn't you correct the guy? Answer this and you might have some integrity left. If not. You have none.Seriously... you're terrible at this.
Why?
Why?
Why?
Why?
See... I can do it too. I don't care if lemieux was overrated and gaynaddy gay 97k calls that a great win... or his fans. It shut everyone up when Saunders fucking schooled him and all lemieux could do was make excuses... I'll bet you were all over 97k's knob after he beat what's a circle weren't you?Comment
-
My integrity with you is hardly a concern... you're seriously Ill or have some type of issue. Lemieux lost twice. Dude said he was undefeated... I don't need to correct him, I actually corrected neither poster, I just said it was funny. Don't like it? Don't whine like a b1tchComment

Comment