Comments Thread For: Charlo To Hurd: You Took Easier Fight - I Want That Work!

[Bronx2245]

After that, he still would have gained something. It's not muscle obviously but extra water weight can be beneficial.

And trying to drain down that far could also be detrimental! It's working for Hurd now, but it's still dangerous too!

[Shadoww702]

The only clown is the person who responds negatively whenever GGG is brought up. Your a GGG hater with little to contribute.

And your the sensitive lil GGG's buttwhore! Thanks for red carding me fkn dic head. You bring up a 36 years old's resume compared to a 28 year olds??? And *** yeah I'm gonna talk sht! Why does clowns like you have to ALWAYS put other boxers down to build GGG up??? A lil insecure maybe??

*** off you! Have fun watching GGG fight another TOMATO CAN may 5th. He's gonna be Mr. 57K after that PPV sparring session. Flops.

This is why not many ppl like GGGTards!

Red K anyone that thinks different about their GOD/MASTER...

[PensionKiller]

And trying to drain down that far could also be detrimental! It's working for Hurd now, but it's still dangerous too!

Yes it can be dangerous but if it's working then he obviously has an advantage. Heavier men can generally take more punishment, their weight into a punch means more force, and are harder to push and bully.

Boxing is an old sport and with so many weight classes, the boxers are fine tuned. We are talking to the lb so every advantage in 5% cardio, or weight, or power etc can add up over 12 rounds.

[MC Hammer]

Tell me which opponents Charlo has fought who are better than Canelo and Jacobs? Charlo hasnt even fought anyone as good as Brook.

Charlo at 27 has fought about as many champs/former champs as ggg at 36. What's sad is that the only good fighters you can name that he's fought were done in the last year

[LetOutTheCage]

Charlo at 27 has fought about as many champs/former champs as ggg at 36. What's sad is that the only good fighters you can name that he's fought were done in the last year

Just as I suspected, you cant name any

[MC Hammer]

Just as I suspected, you cant name any

Williams is as proven as Jacobs, who ggg arguably lost to. Canelo outranks the other opposition. Good on ggg for finally stepping up in comp at age 35

[chrisJS]

Hurd hasn't tried to take any kind of easy path. He fought Frank Galarza when he was being hyped up, fought Harrison, Trout and went after Lara when nobody else wanted tot angle with him. The Charlo brothers are skilled fighters and seem to have found some nasty power recently. I'd like to see Hurd punish Charlo but I think Hurd's style is all wrong against Charlo. Not sure he walks through Charlo's shots like that. Hope I'm wrong.

Yeah, Hurd has taken on 3 fights that were roughly considered 50/50's and one he was a decided underdog. He's a true fighter and gets my respect.

Charlo meanwhile wanted nothing to do with Lara and Andrade, probably lost to a shopworn Vanes and is now fighting Trout after going through the Hurd meat grinder and he's talking about "easier fights"? That's hilarious to me.

I hope Hurd wins because he's much more likable and you know he wants to tango with the best whereas Charlo wouldn't take that angle IMO. I view it as one of the best fights in the sport and as a 50/50.

[chrisJS]

Charlo at 27 has fought about as many champs/former champs as ggg at 36. What's sad is that the only good fighters you can name that he's fought were done in the last year

That's actually a false statement.

GGG has fought more champs (7) than the Charlo twins combined (4 with 2 each). So based on math neither Charlo could possibly have defeated more champions than GGG.

GGG's resume isn't all that special (though he did beat Canelo) but it's a lot better than both theirs combined. I doubt wither one would even step in the ring with Jacobs for example. Jermall damn near froze up when confronted by him.

Williams is as proven as Jacobs, who ggg arguably lost to. Canelo outranks the other opposition. Good on ggg for finally stepping up in comp at age 35

Williams being as proven as Jacobs is comedy. Did the razor thin win over Ishe really do that much for you? I'll take the win over Quillin over his whole career. Traux or Mora probably trump anything J-Rock ever did too. I mean I get it you are trying to prove a point but at least try and be reasonable or believable.

[MC Hammer]

That's actually a false statement.

GGG has fought more champs (7) than the Charlo twins combined (4 with 2 each). So based on math neither Charlo could possibly have defeated more champions than GGG.

GGG's resume isn't all that special (though he did beat Canelo) but it's a lot better than both theirs combined. I doubt wither one would even step in the ring with Jacobs for example. Jermall damn near froze up when confronted by him.



Williams being as proven as Jacobs is comedy. Did the razor thin win over Ishe really do that much for you? I'll take the win over Quillin over his whole career. Traux or Mora probably trump anything J-Rock ever did too. I mean I get it you are trying to prove a point but at least try and be reasonable or believable.

You give Jacobs too much credit for Quillin. He was not that special or highly regarded. Other than that win, Jacobs hasn't done anything. Beating a broken old Mora on a bad knee or Truax doesn't get him ranked higher than the Austin Trout win either.

GGG's record isn't special or good for that matter, especially for a guy on the wrong side of 35, but I guess that's the point which we agree.

[LetOutTheCage]

Williams is as proven as Jacobs, who ggg arguably lost to. Canelo outranks the other opposition. Good on ggg for finally stepping up in comp at age 35

I cant take you seriously after this.