Voted WBO just to piss off WBC WBA IBF guy...i think IBF is the most honest if im real tho
Which belt is most prestigious in boxing
Collapse
-
-
you simply cant separate them as far as corruption goes because they are all at 100%
only one possibly a bit less corrupt is IBO, which is also less legit as far as status and prestige. in fact calling that the best one in general is just silly to be honest.
i still gotta give the bump to the WBC all in all. in the end it matters most who you win it from and under which circumstances. and i feel thats the belt fighters generally have to beat legit competition to get more often. even if they ofcourse will be pushed up the rankings and can get away with a whole lot of BS if they are big earners.Comment
-
Yes they are, but they won't hesitate to strip you if you don't defend.Comment
-
Since the WBA and WBC were the originals, and since the WBA has invented too many kinds of champions, I went with the WBC, but only slightly since they have their own gay-ass silver titles and what not.
But either way, if a guy gets one of the four these days, he's a champion regardless.Comment
-
I say WBC just because its the original. I would have had the WBA close to it if they didn't have bull**** regular champions, super champions, etc. it's a joke.
The Ring belt is where it's at though. Means more IMO. At least before Oscar bought it. The Ring belt was the lineal title.Comment
-
For me it’s not the belt but the person that holds it that give it credibility.
I wish we could do away with all but one champion in every divisionComment
-
Like BoxingTech718 says, the belt doesn't make the man... it's the other way around
Asking which belt is the best is like asking what's your favourite STDComment
-
Comment