The Belt that holds up Fat Dan's pants should be p4p champ, ain't none of us want to see what down there
Which belt is most prestigious in boxing
Collapse
-
-
I think most would agree ring rankings are better than all the others which their rankings do you disagree with?Comment
-
Tradition. Plus the WBA lost prestige with all those silver-wood-rubber super ultra double interim champ titles.
Then you have the IBF which is still viewed by an alphabet belt by some and the WBO which I still don't take seriously for some reason.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
-
Comment
-
I voted the WBC but they suck almost as bad as the other 3. They gave us washed up boxers like Guerrero fighting for vacant titles. The belt that really means the most is all 4 belts. The alphabet groups have rules that make that damn near impossible. Only Crawford has done it but GGG is trying like hell to get it done. All we need is a Saunders vs GGG fight and one of them should be a unified champ. Wilder vs AJ would gives use another but that would still be only 2 of the 17 weight classes unified. That's the way the alphabet groups like it.Comment
-
We know for a fact HBO's lead promoter owns Ring and has selectively enforced rules and invented rules to benefit HBO and harm SHO.
People used to depend on Ring to offer independent fair ratings. They can't offer that anymore as they're no longer independent and they've already been exposed for breaking their promise to not interfere.
What Ring used to be = TBRB now. It's just a different name, but it's the same people who did the Ring rankings before Ring was ruined.Comment
Comment