Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo is 'Temporarily Suspended' By NSAC Due To Failed Tests

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Canelo fans?

    Your response??? Take your time putting together a theory that makes sense to defend him. I know, someone paid off the investigation to find him guilty. Or this is GGG’s fault for complaining too much. Or it’s the entire Mexico, it’s there fault. Or his team for checking meat for a grown man. Or here is the best one, HE DIDNT KNOW. Hope he is suspended indefinitely. I’m sure it’s not the first time he endangered another boxers life by taking PED’s. I HATE athletes that can’t compete on a level playing field fairly. Zero respect for Canelo Alvacheat

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
      more like they heard whining about Canelo being protected.....

      "Bob Bennett, the executive director of the NSAC, reacted to Golovkin's accusations when speak with the Los Angeles Times.

      "There were no adverse analytical findings concerning performance-enhancing drugs or any other illegal substance [in Canelo's system for the first]. There are no instances since I've been at the helm where there was any prejudice, bias or favoritism toward anybody," Bennett said.

      "We are strictly regulators. We have no interest in who wins or loses as long as the playing field is level.
      "

      ..... so they made this (easily-reversible, temporary) decision, to silence the critics
      In other words, Canelo is being protected.

      He'll need more than NSAC to protect him if he gets in the ring with Golovkin again doe.

      That cheating, weight bullying kunt is going to get lit up like a christmas tree!

      Comment


      • #63
        [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/eQzaXfA4LYoaA/*****.gif[/IMG]

        NOOOOO!!! CANELLLOOO !!!

        THEY DONE GOT MY DAWG !!

        NO

        NOT MY DAWG

        #FREENELO

        Comment


        • #64
          Clenelo Alvaroid is a dirty cheat.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Clenelo View Post
            Only an idiot would forget to include the jab, the jab is the meat and drink without it you won't be beating the top fighters.
            1 to 3 were debatable rounds, punch stats prove that for those rounds as well where Canelo only landed more punches in one of those first three rounds.
            7-5. I listed my rounds. Let's see yours with an explanation.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
              I see everybody is skeptical. Am I reading this wrong? I'm reading as the NSAC found probable cause to suspend Canelo. Canelo has to come and present evidence that shows it was the meat. If he doesn't present that evidence he's suspended.
              Conte says some ways Canelo could get of of this, if it was really the meat and what other testing he could do.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                Canelo could just blame his brother..... like when he beat up poor little Archie Solis..... and say that big bro cooked up a clen bbq

                what really pisses me off, is the way that casual fans arselick TV networks, promoters, managers, and now..... testing agencies

                and most of that dribble is hangover from the Floyd/Pac debacle

                whatever lame-arse f@ggy reason the casuals NEED to insist that VADA> USADA..... is preventing them from admitting that VADA CLEARLY DROPPED THE BALL

                1) the situation in Mexico is well-known
                2) the tainted meat excuse is well-used
                3) FACT: you can perform a higher standard of testing, hair follicle
                4) VADA are either..... not aware of those facts..... or they completely ignored them

                no, wait..... could it be like I have been saying all along.....

                that, you get what you pay for..... VADA were NEVER better than USADA..... they were cheaper, so therefore more viable..... for fighters/promoters who are not superstars
                What good would a hair sample do? It could tell them that Canelo had clen in his body - which they already know - but not how it got there.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Death_Adder View Post
                  Oh really? What rounds did you give 97K?

                  1-3 Canelo. Abel himself told 97 he lost them
                  6 Canelo - go back and look at it.
                  10-12 Canelo - two of the three judges had him sweeping it.

                  Canelo outlanded him in power punches.

                  So tell me how 97K won it.
                  I'd have to go looking for my card as I don't remember it off hand. But Golovkin won more rounds and virtually everyone who saw the fight agrees or at most had it a draw. Canelo should've lost. But if thinking he "beat Doelovkin ass" makes you feel better, have a good time.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    The fight is probably still on

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Clenelo View Post
                      Yes, you're spot on with VADA dropping the ball on this one.
                      USADA, on the other hand, has worked wonders in the UFC and has been doing a great job for boxing recently as well.

                      VADA know all about those testing procedures I'm sure of it, what annoys me is Canelo lack of urge to prove his innocence who the fxck just stays quiet and doesn't try to prove it?
                      This is a career-damaging thing going against your name, you absolutely should be trying to prove your innocence!

                      I now nothing about steroids..... but I assume that it is (in principle at least) the same as any standard laboratory test.....

                      the reason why two different laboratories can get two different results..... is the degree of testing, or lack thereof

                      that is one reason why carbon dating can be so controversial

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP