Comments Thread For: Gennady Golovkin-Canelo Alvarez: Positive or Negative?
Collapse
-
Like it or not canelo tainted his legacy. Any athlete in any mjor sport whom has tested positive for peds had a tainted legacy. Just how it goes in the court of public opinion. Canelo will never be considered a great. If he is, the following sentence will remind all of this failed test.Comment
-
Good post bro. For the record, I am rooting for GGG although I think Canelo will pull it off in the rematch. I had Golovkin winning the first fight 7 rounds to 5. Peace.That's a perfectly reasonable stance to take. I can understand Canelo fans and fight fans in general not wanting this to be true but you can't deny this doesn't reflect well on Canelo or the support. I sure hope they make a legitimate attempt to get to the bottom of it and it's not swept under the rug as this article suggests. Nothing would surprise me when it comes to boxing. Regardless of who you're rooting for, everyone should want an even playing field because without it, if the suspected fighter wins the fight, they will not get full credit for the victory and nor should they.
I hope it was just being careless and naive on Canelo's part as well so the fight goes on without controversy before the opening bell rings. We had enough controversy with Byrd's scorecard the first time around. We don't need any extra inconsistencies.Comment
-
Hard to say if it’s from cycling off or from bad meat, as both would give the same test results. One important difference to this fight vs the last fight is they started the testing earlier and that could be why he tested positive. Either way, the NV needs to do an investigation and call Canelo in front of them to explain how that substance got into his systemComment
-
Even if he did a hair follicle test he and his team could say it was from other meat contaminations if any more positives were to show up. So, it's literally a free pass to use this drug so long as you use it in "meat contaminating" moderation. This sad excuse has to eventually stop.Comment
-
Your stuck on Golovkin staying static and Canelo improving. If he does improve and there hasn't been a proper explainstion/investigation of the test failure he won't get credit. Whether he actually improves is doubtful in my mind. There is no doubt that Golovkin will improve. He left his body punching at home for the first fight. It won't happen again.Comment
-
Tony, it comes down to styles.....
1) Canelo shows improvement EVERY SINGLE FIGHT.....
..... Golovkin, does not..... if anything, he has looked limited and flat since he stepped up in competition with Brook
2) Canelo is a thinking fighter who relies on boxing skills to ply his trade..... Golovkin relies on pressure/power
Canelo is clearly a more well-rounded fighter than Golovkin, he has more to his game and he has better skills..... so I am positive that he will make the better adjustments..... EXACTLY like Ward did against Kovalev
you can attribute those improvements to whatever you like, and I am sure you will
that is just naive..... insinuating that Golovkin " forgot " to work the body, is quite frankly ridiculous
what, he forgot to work the body with Jacobs as well huh ?
Golovkin did everything that he could in both of those fights, the control of distance and threat of a counter made Golovkin keep them hands at home
as usual..... the better fighter will make the better adjustments
you are in for a big surpriseLast edited by aboutfkntime; 03-19-2018, 09:28 PM.Comment
-
Golovkin will not be tentative in the rematch. Canelo has to hit and move to try to outsmart and outpoint him. Golovkin won’t let up so Canelo better shoot his load early as it’s likely he will gas out as the fight progresses. Golovkin will define his legacy one way or the other with this fight. He’s not going out quietly so Canelo better be ready to weather the storm. Negative connotation of course will be Canelo’s documented Peds usage. Positive will be if Golovkin is victorious despite that. A Canelo win will be suspect no matter how we spin it.Last edited by Graz; 03-19-2018, 09:29 PM.Comment
-
also, the 154.1 lb'ers will not like hearing this, but.....
..... Clenelo will be better/stronger at the weight..... pun intended lolComment
-
why ?
what changed that will make tentative Golovkin, un-tentative Golovkin?
he was also tentative with Danny Jacobs
it was the control of distance and threat from a counter that made Golovkin tentative in those fights
we told you guys that Golovkin had been fighting scrubs
Canelo has to hit and move to try to outsmart and outpoint him. Golovkin won’t let up so Canelo better shoot his load early as it’s likely he will gas out as the fight progresses. Golovkin will define his legacy one way or the other with this fight. He’s not going out quietly so Canelo better be ready to weather the storm. Negative connotation of course will be Canelo’s documented Peds usage. Positive will be if Golovkin is victorious despite that. A Canelo win will be suspect no matter how we spin it.
there is no documented PED useage
there is a positive test result that 4x experts stated was consistent with meat contamination
when Pac avoided/obstructed drug tests, did it affect his legacy?
are Pac's wins over Cotto, Clottey, Margarito, and Mosley, "suspect"?
if Canelo tests clean for the remainder of his career, it will be forgotten..... Povetkin, Ortiz, Browne, all tested positive more than once, and nobody even mentions it
I get your point, but you are going way overboard
Canelo volunteered for testing, heading into a super-fight..... Pac KILLED a super-fight by refusing to test for FIVE YEARS
that is NOT the same thingComment
Comment