Floyd Mayweather is in my top 3 of all time let the hate begin!

[mcdonalds]

If I can't prove you wrong, then why do I keep referring you to the timelines that are still online?

Are you too lazy to look, or is it because you know that you'll look like the biased fool that you are?


I've admitted defeat with a strawman argument?

Your posts have gotten weaker and weaker, and now all that's left is the nonsense above.


Manny was racially abused by the Mayweather's.

His reputation was tarnished without a shred of evidence.

Yet you think he was a dirty cheat because he wouldn't initially agree to all Floyd's demands?

Yes?

To you, he was guilty.


Floyd was caught out with an IV, but on his sofa instead of a hospital, for supposedly been severely hydrated, despite the fact that he never had an issue in any other fight, he only had to lose 3.5 pounds in a whole month, and it's a known masking agent.

Yet to you, it was nothing.

What does that say about you?


You've had 5 opportunities to come up with an answer, yet the only answer you can muster, is that it's a straw man argument?

Ha!

If Manny had been caught, it would have taken you less than 5 seconds to answer, never mind 5 posts.


You're a joker who's got nothing left to give.

You have yet to prove me wrong about anything

My statements about the negotiations haven been in way more detail than yours too

You keep on bringing up strawman arguments, please stay on topic

[robertzimmerman]

You have yet to prove me wrong about anything

My statements about the negotiations haven been in way more detail than yours too

You keep on bringing up strawman arguments, please stay on topic

I have answered all of your points.

If you search for the timelines, they will give you a comprehensive breakdown of all of the negotiations, and not just the parts that you want to focus on.

I'm not going to tell you that again.


You think that Manny was a cheat because he wouldn't bow down to all of Floyd's initial demands.

Okay. That's fine.

Why don't you also consider Floyd a cheat, when he had an illegal IV administered at home, with a reason given that doesn't tie in with what happened during the rest of his career?


How can one man definitely be guilty, whereas the other can't?

How does that make sense?

Please explain.

Why do you definitely believe that Manny was guilty, yet Floyd wasn't?

A simple answer will suffice.

[mcdonalds]

I have answered all of your points.

If you search for the timelines, they will give you a comprehensive breakdown of all of the negotiations, and not just the parts that you want to focus on.

I'm not going to tell you that again.

If this is true then it should be easy to prove me wrong, but here we are

You lost

[robertzimmerman]

If this is true then it should be easy to prove me wrong, but here we are

You lost

Type the keywords into your search engine, genius.


Why can't you answer 2 simple questions?

They aren't based on quantum physics.


1. Why do you think Manny was guilty?

2. Why do you think Floyd is innocent?


Away you go.

[robertzimmerman]

If this is true then it should be easy to prove me wrong, but here we are

You lost

I lost?

You couldn't even quote the part of my post that referenced Floyd's IV.

It hurts so bad.

You're trapped in a corner with nowhere to go.

A Floyd rider that can't even offer a single answer.

[mcdonalds]

I lost?

You couldn't even quote the part of my post that referenced Floyd's IV.

It hurts so bad.

You're trapped in a corner with nowhere to go.

A Floyd rider that can't even offer a single answer.

You lost because this has nothing to do with the original argument

Strawman arguments don't work

USA WON

[robertzimmerman]

You lost because this has nothing to do with the original argument

Strawman arguments don't work

USA WON

Why do you think Floyd is innocent?

[robertzimmerman]

I'd like to apologise to the other members for spamming the thread with this clown.

[spytactics]

Top 3? Lmao

[Blue54]

Top 3? Lmao

50-0
Championships from 126 to 154
Bronze medalist at 17