Better win: Joshua's win vs Wladimir or Wilder's win over Ortiz?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #11
    Originally posted by Sicario*
    Simple question. Tell us which one and why. Poll incoming.
    Already been done. Wlad won by a landslide.

    Comment

    • dellboi94
      Up and Comer
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • May 2017
      • 46
      • 1
      • 0
      • 7,508

      #12
      Wlad, despite being past his best he was still far more proven than Ortiz and in better physical health.

      Comment

      • Fists_of_Fury
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2006
        • 7366
        • 2,351
        • 12,608
        • 58,085

        #13
        Just shows the hypocrisy of some of NSB clowns. In other threads they bash fighting a former champ, fighting a guy coming off a loss, fighting a guy coming off a long layoff, etc... and now the same people say that a win over a former champ coming off a long layoff and loss is a good win...

        Comment

        • SAINTSTEVE
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jan 2018
          • 993
          • 29
          • 27
          • 8,158

          #14
          I say Joshua's because Wilder didn't look great or dominant vs Ortiz but rather weathered the storm and I'll give Wlad the benefit of the doubt of not being sufficiently shot.
          Last edited by SAINTSTEVE; 03-08-2018, 12:41 PM.

          Comment

          • Derranged
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2005
            • 46593
            • 2,126
            • 1,350
            • 162,628

            #15
            Originally posted by Uncle Rodge
            Think about what you're saying b4 you cry about it.

            Undisputed for a decade vs beaten nobody.
            Thing is that Wladimir was old, coming off a loss and had been inactive.

            Ortiz was younger and a little more active.

            Comment

            • moochi
              We need one organization!
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2004
              • 3444
              • 378
              • 60
              • 26,344

              #16
              Both are similar but on their merits Joshua's win is 5 times better.

              Reasons...

              Joshua had half as many fights as Wilder

              Klitschko vs Ortiz ranking...come on Klitschko was King for 10+ years and KO'ing everybody up until his last fight.

              Ortiz - on merits hasn't really beaten any World Champ nor top 5 contender.

              Physically Vlad looked really good..his loss to Fury was not a beating just out maneuvered by an awkward boxer. Vlad had more stamina than what AJ did in that fight. Ortiz vs Wilder did not display good stamina and visibly slowed down in output and actual speed.

              Comment

              • boliodogs
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2008
                • 33358
                • 824
                • 1,782
                • 309,589

                #17
                Wlad is a much better fighter than Ortiz prime against prime. AJ beat a 41 year old Wlad coming of a bad loss and a long layoff. Wilder beat a 38 year old undefeated Ortiz. I think both wins are of equal quality but there was no option to say the wins were even. I voted for Wilder's win being the slightly better win.

                Comment

                • satiev1
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Nov 2015
                  • 4661
                  • 575
                  • 0
                  • 78,492

                  #18
                  Originally posted by HeadShots
                  Has Ortiz ever been manhandled like this before WIlder? Yes that was a journeyman.









                  there was also Puritty and Brewster btw.
                  This was also before Klitchko went on his 10 years reign of terror. He improved since then. Ortiz isn't a risk taker like corrie sanders. He had wilder hurt and backed away. I don't see him beating vlad based on the bums he's fought. Ortiz had issues coming close to wilder. He won't be able to close the gap to land his left. Even if he lands one time, he's not outboxing him.

                  Comment

                  • Uncle Rodge
                    Rigotard
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 2042
                    • 259
                    • 467
                    • 12,316

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Derranged
                    Thing is that Wladimir was old, coming off a loss and had been inactive.

                    Ortiz was younger and a little more active.
                    2 years older, man; still beaten nobody.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP