Banning drug cheat Neloterol will become a very good example for the sport of boxing

[SceneBoxer]

how did it affect the sport, i mean CONCLUSIVELY and/or NEGATIVELY

meaning, who did he cheat and what did he cheat them out of

try not to use words like ''if, maybe, perhaps, might.....''

Boxing is a sport where performance can't be easily measured like in track & field, cycling, swimming, etc.

Banned substances can help a boxer in training for a fight and it's already an unfair advantage that would result to an enhanced/roided version of the boxer in the actual fight.

Roid hard, fight harder...

[Elroy The Great]

[IMG]https://greatist.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_main/public/*****%20%283%29_6.gif?itok=lE4rAOBM[/IMG]
"CLEN !!!!!!!!!!!!''

[Elroy The Great]

Boxing is a sport where performance can't be easily measured like in track & field, cycling, swimming, etc.

Banned substances can help a boxer in training for a fight and it's already an unfair advantage that would result to an enhanced/roided version of the boxer in the actual fight.

Roid hard, fight harder...

all SPECULATIVE. how can something thats pure speculation be given such a negative stigma

its never been proven to be advantageous to be on the stuff. not one fight shows this advantage.

when a guy exits training camp, i defy a person to say CONCLUSIVELY ''STOP THE FIGHT !!!! that guy took roids/p'e'ds !!!''

heres MY definition of ''unfair advantage''

something that works ALL THE TIME FOR EVERY ATHLETE.

if it doesnt meet this criteria, why ban it ?!?!?!?

[Elroy The Great]

the evan reference was too deep

[SceneBoxer]

all SPECULATIVE. how can something thats pure speculation be given such a negative stigma

its never been proven to be advantageous to be on the stuff. not one fight shows this advantage.

when a guy exits training camp, i defy a person to say CONCLUSIVELY ''STOP THE FIGHT !!!! that guy took roids/p'e'ds !!!''

heres MY definition of ''unfair advantage''

some that works ALL THE TIME FOR EVERY ATHLETE.

if it doesnt meet this criteria, why ban it ?!?!?!?

Better for you to review the banned substances list and report here which substance won't give an unfair advantage.

Deal? At least this will make you busy...

[Elroy The Great]

Better for you to review the banned substances list and report here which substance won't give an unfair advantage.

Deal? At least this will make you busy...

its your claim that theres a DEFINITIVE ADVANTAGE in BOXING.....

but i know. supporting YOUR stand is asking too much

#IVOTEDFORHOLYTOO

[Elroy The Great]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Doping_cases_in_boxing

and

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_deaths_due_to_injuries_sustained_in_boxing

which list is the more shocking

[Elroy The Great]

i still dont know who got cheated and out of what

[SceneBoxer]

Sorry Mr.Elroy but your opinion on roids will not be taken seriously here. hehe Much better to present it to WADA, they might take you seriously.

[Citizen Koba]

all SPECULATIVE. how can something thats pure speculation be given such a negative stigma

its never been proven to be advantageous to be on the stuff. not one fight shows this advantage.

when a guy exits training camp, i defy a person to say CONCLUSIVELY ''STOP THE FIGHT !!!! that guy took roids/p'e'ds !!!''

heres MY definition of ''unfair advantage''

something that works ALL THE TIME FOR EVERY ATHLETE.

if it doesnt meet this criteria, why ban it ?!?!?!?

I'm not really following the logic of your argument, nor am I quite clear if you're engaging in some kind of mild trolling to illustrate some point or other, but as a rule of thumb I'd say the highlighted is too great a burden of proof. Merely to establish that a substance is likely give a competitive advantage in some instances should be sufficient to ban it in my book. Kinda depends on what the governing/sanctioning bodies are hoping to achieve though - is it 'fairness' within the sport, or fighter safety?