Originally posted by soul_survivor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
They were going to ROB Ortiz
Collapse
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostFirst of, this is not to discredit Wilder, who put in the work and pulled off a terrific win, although I think he showed just how open he is and how poor his defence is.
THIS is a thread about the fact that the judges had Wilder a round or 2 up going into the 10th round. If Wilder never got the stoppage, they were planning on robbing Ortiz on the cards...I mean WTF!!!!
This is the yet another big fight in the US with judges being bought out. I can't think of a single high profile bout in recent times where this hasnt happened (GGG/Canelo, Kov/Ward all come to mind). This **** is getting out of hand.
Ban the sport in the US if it continues.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cheek busting View PostLol literally everybody with common sense had Ortiz UP HUGE like 8 rounds to 2 at the time of stoppage.
In the RBR thread I don't remember anybody having it more than 7 rounds to 3, with two 10-8 rounds for Wilder and 1 10-8 for Ortiz.
You can't debate Ortiz deserving a 10-8 round in I forget which round it was, but the one he had Wilder out on his feet, and had roles been reversed, he would have been stopped no question.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Graz View PostIs that true? If Wilder didn’t rally in the 10th, Ortiz was clearly ahead. If it is true you’re right, the corruption is much too blatant now.
i had ortiz up 1 at ringside, but if the judges flip one round, then wilder is up 1. that doesnt mean the fix is in. rounds 3 and 4 could go either way.
not to mention wilder got robbed of a clear knockdown in the second round.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bobby Deez View PostYou can't even do basic math you ******ed motha****a.. Bobby Deez just busted them cheeks open, cuz.
Where is my math messed up? The concept remains the same - Wilder won 2, or 3 rounds tops.
And ortiz deserved a 10-8 round in the round in which he had Wilder wobbling around the ring for over a minute.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cheek busting View PostHahah I love BOBBY DEEZ, DOE??
Where is my math messed up? The concept remains the same - Wilder won 2, or 3 rounds tops.
And ortiz deserved a 10-8 round in the round in which he had Wilder wobbling around the ring for over a minute.
If he had survived the 10th he wouldn't have won with 3 knockdowns against him and 2 or 3 rounds tops. So where is all this robbery ****?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bobby Deez View PostYou said you had it 8 rounds to 2. The fight ended in the 10th.
If he had survived the 10th he wouldn't have won with 3 knockdowns against him and 2 or 3 rounds tops. So where is all this robbery ****?
No way to justify Wilder being up one round going into the 10th. None.
BOBBY DEEEEZ hahah
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cheek busting View PostOk, so 7 rounds to 2, or 6 rounds to 3.. Each of them deserved one 10-8 round.
No way to justify Wilder being up one round going into the 10th. None.
BOBBY DEEEEZ hahah
Comment
-
Originally posted by CubanGuyNYC View PostIn theory, no punches even have to land for a round to be awarded to one of the fighters. For instance, if one guy is throwing punches and missing, while the other guy merely runs away, it’s safe to say the aggressor should be awarded the round. An extreme example, yes, but it illustrates my point.
Nothing much has to happen to find the winner of a round. Last night, one of the posters here said he scored the first four rounds 10-10 (!) “because nothing happened.” Pretty laughable, if you ask me. I mean, the occasional 10-10 round is acceptable, but four in a row?
Comment
Comment