Leading into the Wilder fight he was undefeated. Wilder ended that. So there's credit for that.
However...
Given these two, my ask is this: What exactly made Ortiz an elite fighter in your eyes?
I don't even care about his age. I'm questioning his resume and why he's so highly rated.
Ortiz is clearly a "name" fighter, he draws money. But why exactly? Just because he's Cuban? Like how Gamboa was a cash draw with only one valid and one contested signature win?
However...
- Ortiz has two real "Names" on his record, one in Malik Scott, and he got taken the distance by Scott. The same guy Wilder knocked out early. The other, a WAY past prime Tony Thompson.
- He has a solid KO ratio, but again, it's not like he really fought anyone worth noting other than Scott and Thompson, and he was unable to KO or even drop Wilder - a guy once dropped by a journeyman in Harold Sconiers.
Given these two, my ask is this: What exactly made Ortiz an elite fighter in your eyes?
I don't even care about his age. I'm questioning his resume and why he's so highly rated.
Ortiz is clearly a "name" fighter, he draws money. But why exactly? Just because he's Cuban? Like how Gamboa was a cash draw with only one valid and one contested signature win?
Comment