Hopkins, Jones & Toney: Let's Rank 'Em Again!

[MetalVomit]

1.Hopkins
2.Jones
3.Toney

I'd put Toney higher if he would have not doped for Ruiz(it was so nice to watch him embarass Ruiz though), and if he would have been in acceptable shape, and beaten Rahman.

[GunStar]

That's non sense, and I see getting called on it brings out the ***** in you.

Losses at the end of your career do not over write what you did in the bulk of your career.

Robinson, Ali, and Leonard are perfect examples of that.

Go get a clue and then come back.

I just can't believe you said this again.

[THE REAL NINJA]

Toney was like 200lbs a month before the fight, he came overweight out of shape & also was having personal problems at that time, Jones got lucky with both Toney & Hopkins.

100% Toney would've been a repeat of the Nunn fight. Again InThisCorner, do the research, believe what you wanna believe.

both fights were as close to a shut out it gets thats not lucky to bad for Toney he knew he was fighting he should have been in shape for it ....you cant take that away from roy

[K-DOGG]

Losses late in a fighter's career, after he's past his best, mean NOTHING.

Ali's losses to Spinks, Holmes and Berbick=NOTHING

Holmes's losses to Spinks, Tyson, Holyfield, & McCall=NOTHING

Louis's losses to Charles & Marciano=NOTHING

Jeffries loss to Johnson=NOTHING

Leonard's losses to Norris & Camacho=NOTHING

Guess what about Jones losses to Tarver & Johnson?

That's right.....NOTHING

[Bozo_no no]

I just can't believe you said this again.

I can't believe you're back after your big dramatic "I'm never coming back" speech.

[Smokin']

ahhhh excuses excuses. Is this all you Roy haters can do? Roy beat Hopkins and Toney at the physical primes of their career, and that's that. Was it Roy's fault that Toney couldn't stop eating? Was it Roy's fault that Hopkins made a legacy for himself after Roy dominated him?

[Bozo_no no]

Losses late in a fighter's career, after he's past his best, mean NOTHING.

Ali's losses to Spinks, Holmes and Berbick=NOTHING

Holmes's losses to Spinks, Tyson, Holyfield, & McCall=NOTHING

Louis's losses to Charles & Marciano=NOTHING

Jeffries loss to Johnson=NOTHING

Leonard's losses to Norris & Camacho=NOTHING

Guess what about Jones losses to Tarver & Johnson?

That's right.....NOTHING

Bing bing bing bing! We have a winner.

The best part is some of these bitches don't even know about some of the losses some of the greatest fighters ever suffered at the end of their careers, because that's not what's looked backed upon when judging a fighter.

Some people are so cluesless.

[GunStar]

I can't believe you're back after your big dramatic "I'm never coming back" speech.

You're the #1 joke here & everyone ignores your ass.

[THE REAL NINJA]

Losses late in a fighter's career, after he's past his best, mean NOTHING.

Ali's losses to Spinks, Holmes and Berbick=NOTHING

Holmes's losses to Spinks, Tyson, Holyfield, & McCall=NOTHING

Louis's losses to Charles & Marciano=NOTHING

Jeffries loss to Johnson=NOTHING

Leonard's losses to Norris & Camacho=NOTHING

Guess what about Jones losses to Tarver & Johnson?

That's right.....NOTHING

and um can we add old Holy and Mike to that list

[rhythm]

what's up guys i'm new t othe forum, but not new to boxing...

i have always felt that bhop was the best of the 3. the combination of his skills & his knowledge of the ring thrown in with his ability of being able exploit his opponents weakness puts him on top.he is one of the smartest(ring wise) fighters ever.