Comments Thread For: UKAD Spent 600K To Pursue Doping Case Against Tyson Fury

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • McNulty
    Hamsterdam
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 6576
    • 430
    • 348
    • 28,319

    #31
    Where the hell did 600k go?

    Also, Fury ate pig ****?

    Comment

    • kafkod
      I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2013
      • 24756
      • 2,177
      • 1,790
      • 405,373

      #32
      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
      You're too ******. If he had accepted the backdated ban earlier, Wlad could have had the fight changed to an NC because Fury would have been technically banned when they fought. Doesn't matter that he tested clean.
      Are you too ****** to understand that the test UKAD accused him of failing happened when he was training for Hammer, not Wlad?

      If UKAD had a real case against him - apart from refusal to be tested again - the Wlad fight wouldn't have happened, because Fury would have already been banned before he even fought Hammer.

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #33
        Originally posted by kafkod
        Are you too ****** to understand that the test UKAD accused him of failing happened when he was training for Hammer, not Wlad?

        If UKAD had a real case against him - apart from refusal to be tested again - the Wlad fight wouldn't have happened, because Fury would have already been banned before he even fought Hammer.
        You are too ****** OMG.

        It doesn't matter. He would have been technically banned for the Wlad fight and Wlad could have got the result changed. FFS.

        He waited and dragged it out until after the 2 year mark so that wouldn't happen.

        28-11-2015 = he beats Klitschko
        September 2017 = Reports Fury is causing delays for the start of the hearing.
        12-12-2017 = he accepts a 2 year backdated ban, which puts the Wlad fight in the clear.

        Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 02-07-2018, 01:23 PM.

        Comment

        • kafkod
          I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2013
          • 24756
          • 2,177
          • 1,790
          • 405,373

          #34
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
          You are too ****** OMG.

          It doesn't matter. He would have been technically banned for the Wlad fight and Wlad could have got the result changed. FFS.

          He waited and dragged it out until after the 2 year mark so that wouldn't happen.

          28-11-2015 = he beats Klitschko
          September 2017 = Reports Fury is causing delays for the start of the hearing.
          12-12-2017 = he accepts a 2 year backdated ban, which puts the Wlad fight in the clear.

          It was UKAD who were mainly responsible for delaying the hearings, as you well know. I'm finished talking to you now. No point going back and forth like this with a lying troll.

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #35
            Originally posted by kafkod
            It was UKAD who were mainly responsible for delaying the hearings, as you well know. I'm finished talking to you now. No point going back and forth like this with a lying troll.
            No lies just facts. The Fury's are a bunch of scummy cheating bastards. Go cry.

            Comment

            • fozze
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Aug 2011
              • 47
              • 0
              • 0
              • 7,924

              #36
              Makes me laugh everything is not as it seems 😂😂😂

              Comment

              • Clegg
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 24674
                • 3,726
                • 2,307
                • 233,274

                #37
                Originally posted by kafkod
                It was UKAD who were mainly responsible for delaying the hearings, as you well know. I'm finished talking to you now. No point going back and forth like this with a lying troll.
                So you think that if Fury was offered the exact same deal just 2 weeks earlier, he would've accepted it?

                Comment

                • Shadoww702
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2015
                  • 41176
                  • 4,546
                  • 2,938
                  • 250,035

                  #38
                  Originally posted by kafkod
                  Something not mentioned here is the other charge UKAD brought against Fury, refusing to be tested, which is punishable with a 4 year ban.

                  UKAD dropped that charge completely, though Fury freely admitted telling a UKAD team to *************** off when they came round to test him during his camp for the rematch with Wlad.

                  Clearly, they did that in return for him accepting a back-dated ban for the nandrolone charge, which meant that he couldn't then sue them for false accusation and resulting loss of earnings.
                  I agree with you! UKAD is a JOKE! And curropt as ***! They keep changing the rules and doing whatever the *** they want!

                  They are just as BAD as the AIBA! Run by a bunch of PIMPS and ppl with connections to organized crime.

                  Comment

                  • Shadoww702
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2015
                    • 41176
                    • 4,546
                    • 2,938
                    • 250,035

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                    No lies just facts. The Fury's are a bunch of scummy cheating bastards. Go cry.
                    Soo your cool with UKAD??? Knowing how CORRUPT they are???

                    Comment

                    • Shadoww702
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2015
                      • 41176
                      • 4,546
                      • 2,938
                      • 250,035

                      #40
                      Originally posted by kafkod
                      It was UKAD who were mainly responsible for delaying the hearings, as you well know. I'm finished talking to you now. No point going back and forth like this with a lying troll.
                      They're just as bad as that C UNT from the Nevada Atletic Commission that wanted to ban Diaz for Life because SHE said "I feel he DISRESPECTED me". These @ss WIPES get all that POWER and NO one checks them. Then they think they are GODS and *** with anyone they DON'T like.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP