You're too ******. If he had accepted the backdated ban earlier, Wlad could have had the fight changed to an NC because Fury would have been technically banned when they fought. Doesn't matter that he tested clean.
Are you too ****** to understand that the test UKAD accused him of failing happened when he was training for Hammer, not Wlad?
If UKAD had a real case against him - apart from refusal to be tested again - the Wlad fight wouldn't have happened, because Fury would have already been banned before he even fought Hammer.
Are you too ****** to understand that the test UKAD accused him of failing happened when he was training for Hammer, not Wlad?
If UKAD had a real case against him - apart from refusal to be tested again - the Wlad fight wouldn't have happened, because Fury would have already been banned before he even fought Hammer.
You are too ****** OMG.
It doesn't matter. He would have been technically banned for the Wlad fight and Wlad could have got the result changed. FFS.
He waited and dragged it out until after the 2 year mark so that wouldn't happen.
28-11-2015 = he beats Klitschko
September 2017 = Reports Fury is causing delays for the start of the hearing.
12-12-2017 = he accepts a 2 year backdated ban, which puts the Wlad fight in the clear.
It doesn't matter. He would have been technically banned for the Wlad fight and Wlad could have got the result changed. FFS.
He waited and dragged it out until after the 2 year mark so that wouldn't happen.
28-11-2015 = he beats Klitschko
September 2017 = Reports Fury is causing delays for the start of the hearing.
12-12-2017 = he accepts a 2 year backdated ban, which puts the Wlad fight in the clear.
It was UKAD who were mainly responsible for delaying the hearings, as you well know. I'm finished talking to you now. No point going back and forth like this with a lying troll.
It was UKAD who were mainly responsible for delaying the hearings, as you well know. I'm finished talking to you now. No point going back and forth like this with a lying troll.
No lies just facts. The Fury's are a bunch of scummy cheating bastards. Go cry.
It was UKAD who were mainly responsible for delaying the hearings, as you well know. I'm finished talking to you now. No point going back and forth like this with a lying troll.
So you think that if Fury was offered the exact same deal just 2 weeks earlier, he would've accepted it?
Something not mentioned here is the other charge UKAD brought against Fury, refusing to be tested, which is punishable with a 4 year ban.
UKAD dropped that charge completely, though Fury freely admitted telling a UKAD team to *************** off when they came round to test him during his camp for the rematch with Wlad.
Clearly, they did that in return for him accepting a back-dated ban for the nandrolone charge, which meant that he couldn't then sue them for false accusation and resulting loss of earnings.
I agree with you! UKAD is a JOKE! And curropt as ***! They keep changing the rules and doing whatever the *** they want!
They are just as BAD as the AIBA! Run by a bunch of PIMPS and ppl with connections to organized crime.
It was UKAD who were mainly responsible for delaying the hearings, as you well know. I'm finished talking to you now. No point going back and forth like this with a lying troll.
They're just as bad as that C UNT from the Nevada Atletic Commission that wanted to ban Diaz for Life because SHE said "I feel he DISRESPECTED me". These @ss WIPES get all that POWER and NO one checks them. Then they think they are GODS and *** with anyone they DON'T like.
Comment