If Marquez was ....

[IronDanHamza]

because im comparing what they did in 09-10!! so why should i leave out some of pac's fights just because floyd fought less??? that just goes to show who the a-side was during that time frame!!!

when did i said a buffoon is a primate??

i said its used to describe one, in a racist way.

A buffon is NOT a word used to describe a primate! Buffoon is not a racial slur in any way.

And you can't determine who the A side is if one of the guys sample size is larger. That's just common sense surely?

[WesternChamp]

A buffon is NOT a word used to describe a primate! Buffoon is not a racial slur in any way.

And you can't determine who the A side is if one of the guys sample size is larger. That's just common sense surely?

that right there tells you who the a-side is then!!!

pac fought more than floyd during 09-10, pac racked in more ppv buys during that time frame.

and about the word "buffoon" not bring racist --

Many black people I polled responded the same. All the white people I asked gave the opposite answer.

The question was whether the word "buffoon" or any derivative is racist when applied to a black person.

Many black people either answered yes or said they understood how it could be interpreted as such.

[IronDanHamza]

that right there tells you who the a-side is then!!!

pac fought more than floyd during 09-10, pac racked in more ppv buys during that time frame.

and about the word "buffoon" not bring racist --

Many black people I polled responded the same. All the white people I asked gave the opposite answer.

The question was whether the word "buffoon" or any derivative is racist when applied to a black person.

Many black people either answered yes or said they understood how it could be interpreted as such.

You did not just make up a poll

Buffoonery is just idiotic behaviour. It's not a racial slur.

Anyway, it doesn't show who the A side is it shows Pacquaio has a higher number due to sample size. If anything it disproves it.

They fought the same fightere and Floyd always did higher numbers against said opponents. That shows who the A side was.

[travestyny]

that right there tells you who the a-side is then!!!

pac fought more than floyd during 09-10, pac racked in more ppv buys during that time frame.

and about the word "buffoon" not bring racist --

Many black people I polled responded the same. All the white people I asked gave the opposite answer.

The question was whether the word "buffoon" or any derivative is racist when applied to a black person.

Many black people either answered yes or said they understood how it could be interpreted as such.

Lmaoooo. Omg this thread is straight comedy. Thank you for entertaining us at your expense, you buffoon!!!

Log off!

[WesternChamp]

You did not just make up a poll

Buffoonery is just idiotic behaviour. It's not a racial slur.

Anyway, it doesn't show who the A side is it shows Pacquaio has a higher number due to sample size. If anything it disproves it.

They fought the same fightere and Floyd always did higher numbers against said opponents. That shows who the A side was.

i didnt make that poll!! it's a statement i got off someone who made that poll!

so if that doesnt show who the a-side is, then how did yall determine that floyd is the a-side then?

[WesternChamp]

You did not just make up a poll

Buffoonery is just idiotic behaviour. It's not a racial slur.

Anyway, it doesn't show who the A side is it shows Pacquaio has a higher number due to sample size. If anything it disproves it.

They fought the same fightere and Floyd always did higher numbers against said opponents. That shows who the A side was.

well, in 09-10 pac actually had the higher number. cut it, slice it however you want.

[IronDanHamza]

i didnt make that poll!! it's a statement i got off someone who made that poll!

so if that doesnt show who the a-side is, then how did yall determine that floyd is the a-side then?

I've just told you how.

Compare who did the highest when against the same opponents in that time frame.

Or, work out the average.

[IronDanHamza]

well, in 09-10 pac actually had the higher number. cut it, slice it however you want.

.....Because the sample size is bigger.

[PAC-BOY]

who's name was going to get the top billing it would have been Floyds he would get to walk to the ring second gets to pick the locker room he was the aside and pac was not the only thing that the ppv buys did was have them have a 50/50 split which was fair

when it was Floyd vs Pac Floyd was going to be the aside

You dont get it do you?Who walks in first is an agreement between the two camps. Not who is on the a side. lol :AOR: gets to pick locker room lmfao...dude are you serious? lol

If i were in the woods i vision myself sitting on a log...talking to a tree.

fact is...Manny at the time generated more PPV buys than Floyd and Money. Look it up on Forbes back then. Yet still you still hold on to the thought:AOR:

[PAC-BOY]

1. So your argument is that USADA was ok when Pac suggests them but not when Floyd suggests them? That doesn’t make sense bro.

2. The fight should have been made in 2010 when they were prime like everyone wanted. It fell apart only because Pac needed 24 days to recover from giving a tablespoon of blood. There were no real negotiations after that until the fight was actually made. When else did the teams sit down to discuss this fight besides those 2 times?

3. I guess it’s your opinion so I can’t argue with you. For me, makes no sense for him to be scared of someone he already beat. And in my opinion, it definitely shouldn’t have been a split decision. If he was shook, he wouldn’t have rematched Castillo and Maidana.

Ill get back to you tomorrow at work i gotta go.