Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If Marquez was ....

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
    I really dont like the dude. But i dont let that cloud my judgment. As much as nobody will believe that. I have my reasons for it but from that I know there was never that many rumors of Floyd ducking DLH by going in retirement. The fight was close. By a point if i remember correctly. And at that time it was record breaking numbers and Floyd biggest pay day. Even though there was a guarantee rematch in the contract. That was only good if Floyd was still an active fighter. Why if the fight was so close and a good fight and it broke records and was the highest pay day...Why retire before a rematch that would have generated possibly more money and more PPV sales? Thats why i think what i think...just doesnt make sense to me.(The reason to duck DLH...Because Floyd knew how close he came to losing and If he could win again was in doubt. DLH also couldnt be bought nor needed Money.
    ........................
    1. So your argument is that USADA was ok when Pac suggests them but not when Floyd suggests them? That doesn’t make sense bro.

    2. The fight should have been made in 2010 when they were prime like everyone wanted. It fell apart only because Pac needed 24 days to recover from giving a tablespoon of blood. There were no real negotiations after that until the fight was actually made. When else did the teams sit down to discuss this fight besides those 2 times?

    3. I guess it’s your opinion so I can’t argue with you. For me, makes no sense for him to be scared of someone he already beat. And in my opinion, it definitely shouldn’t have been a split decision. If he was shook, he wouldn’t have rematched Castillo and Maidana.

    Comment


    • my biiatch "tragedy"..

      what fights am i suppose to compare then??

      first nego was during 09-10


      floyd fought once in 09 and once in 10. think before you let your fingers run.


      so how should i compare 09-10 from floyd and pac then???? should i bring in other fights from floyd so that it will even up with manny?

      Comment


      • during 09-12 floyd fought once per year only, 4 fights total. lol

        during 09-12 pac fought 8 times!! LOL!!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
          during 09-12 floyd fought once per year only, 4 fights total. lol

          during 09-12 pac fought 8 times!! LOL!!
          You’re a certified moron. Lmaoooo. Comparing two fights to four fights is idiotic. I shouldn’t have to explain this to you any more, you idiot.

          Who had the highest average ppv sales in that time frame and what do you think would happen if you were comparing 4 fights to 4 fights you idiot.

          You are simply a moron.

          Comment


          • well, how am i suppose to compare fights from floyd/pac in 09-10???? so because pac fought more during that time frame, i shouldnt include all those fights?? what kinda ******ed logic is this?

            "tragedy" crying because pac fought more than floyd so i shouldnt include all those fights from pac LOL!! that's the main point of showing that pac WAS the a-side.

            Comment


            • so from 09-12 floyd fought once a year..

              this was during the time where floyd was being pressured to fight manny.

              now i know why he waited until 2015. he was only fighting once a year to take less damage. no wonder why he said there was "no rush".

              Comment


              • i cant compare 4 fights to 4 fights when floyd only fought 2 times idiot!!! this is to show who was the a-side during that time frame so why would i leave out all the other fights from manny?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
                  well, let's see --

                  2009-2010, that's around then time when the first negotiation started right?

                  in 2009

                  floyd vs marquez = $1 mil

                  in 2010

                  floyd vs molsey = $1.4 mil

                  so 2009-2010 floyd = $2.4 mil


                  in 2009

                  pac vs hatton = $850k

                  pac vs cotto = $1.25 mil

                  in 2010

                  pac vs clottey = $700k

                  pac vs marg = $1.15mil

                  2009-2010 for pac = $3.9 mil
                  "tragedy" having a heart attack seeing this post

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
                    i cant compare 4 fights to 4 fights when floyd only fought 2 times idiot!!! this is to show who was the a-side during that time frame so why would i leave out all the other fights from manny?
                    You’re too ****** to even realize that what you are doing makes no sense moron

                    How are you to compare them? I told you how you moron. How about a little concept known as averages.

                    According to you, Kobe Bryant is a more prolific scorer than Michael Jordan because he has more total points, though he averaged 25 ppg and Jordan averaged 30 ppg.

                    You moron

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
                      just as i thought. nothing explaining how floyd is the a-side.

                      nobody is talking about the 50/50 split.

                      im asking you how is floyd the a-side when pac sold more ppv??

                      floyd's name and walking out 2nd is just floyd wanting to have evetything his way or no way. this doesnt mean he's the a-side, just means he's more of a diva than pac is.
                      fine Floyd was the aside because he held the Highest Grossing PPV 2,480,000 and PPV REVENUE $136 million for a boxer

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP