Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Embraces The Idea of Wilder vs. Povetkin Next

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sledgeweather17
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2015
    • 3587
    • 154
    • 5
    • 34,855

    #51
    Originally posted by champion4ever
    You know what? You have a moral obligation to be intelligent. There once was time Ortiz was Wilder's WBC mandatory challenger as was Joshua's mandatory challenger for his WBA title, until Anthony decided to exercise his option on defending his IBF title instead, which left King Kong to challenge for Wilder's WBC title because he was ranked by both governing bodies until he lost his mandatory status due to a failed drug test for a banned substance. A diuretic masking agent to be exact; In order to flush and rinse his kidneys from all the impurities from his system.
    Fake news you spreading there.

    Stirvirne was Wilder's mando, not Ortiz. But Showtime didn't want to televise Wilder vs Stirvirne, so Wilder paid Stirvirne step aside money so he can fight Ortiz, but Ortiz tested positive for drugs.

    Moral of the story? You lied, Ortiz wasn't Wilder's mandatory when he failed the drug test.

    Comment

    • SN!PER
      locked and loaded
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 23139
      • 1,204
      • 769
      • 107,506

      #52
      That mop head midget cain't lay a paw on me. Without them drugs he got no power whatsoever. He gonna get flustrated and follow me around like LeMule done against BJ Saunders. I'm a slip his punches and pop him in the side of that big noggin. Temple shots yall, it gonna be ugly. He goin down hard. Face first.

      Comment

      • Dr.Cool
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2016
        • 1369
        • 103
        • 57
        • 8,319

        #53
        No one cares about Povetkin anymore. He is a known cheat. He hasn't had a meaningful fight in years. Even if it happens next, it should have already happened. Povetkin was a top hw. WAS. It is a lot like Ortiz, both looked great, then got popped for peds, didn't look as great, agreed to fight Wilder, again got popped for peds, and now hasn't beat any top hw in years and years. Povetkin and Ortiz looked like killers on peds. With VADA testing, both are bums.

        If it is hw boxing and it isn't AJ-Wilder, it really does not matter. I don't care. Wake me up when AJ finally agrees to fight Wilder.

        Comment

        • Cheek busting
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2014
          • 4507
          • 194
          • 83
          • 9,721

          #54
          Gonna be a huge problem with finding venue.

          Povetkin and his tema were found liable in a federal court in NY - so if they ever fight in the States, they will have their purses held and forfeited to Wilder (I thought it was BS they ruled for Wilder - discrimination against Russian clearly).

          As long as Povetkin doesn't fight in USA, or leave any tangible assets, accounts, etc. here, he will never pay a dime to Wilder, doe..

          Unless Wilder and his team will agree to not pursue the lien against Povetkin.

          I'd recommend a neutral country like UK - even though they are both foreign fighters to UK, I guarantee fight would still be huge there and MORE lucrative than USA. Wilder is no PPV headliner iN USA, and is worth at most 2.3ish million to headline a Showtime/PBC card.

          In Russia, fight would be worth at least 8-11 million, but I doubt Wilder will want to go to Russia.

          IN UK I bet the fight could generate 5-8 million.

          Comment

          • Dr.Cool
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2016
            • 1369
            • 103
            • 57
            • 8,319

            #55
            Originally posted by Deontay Wilder
            That mop head midget cain't lay a paw on me. Without them drugs he got no power whatsoever. He gonna get flustrated and follow me around like LeMule done against BJ Saunders. I'm a slip his punches and pop him in the side of that big noggin. Temple shots yall, it gonna be ugly. He goin down hard. Face first.
            I'm pretty sure midget is a derogatory term. They prefer to be called dwarves. Or so I hear.

            Comment

            • Boksfan
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2017
              • 9185
              • 277
              • 355
              • 66,176

              #56
              Originally posted by juggernaut666
              Ortiz was Joshuas mandatory in another sanctioning body after Pulev , who was his IBF mandatory .

              Hearn guaranteed Ortiz a title shot after Pulev , he pulled out and Takam took his place .

              Instead of wating for the Joshua / Takam winner , he took off like a fool and went and got a Wilder fight . Except not being the smartest guy again ( hes done handful of things to sabotage his own career ) he couldn't fill out a simple form and got a ban that removed him as a mandatory for Joshua so he missed out on a pay day and further delayed his career.
              Maybe he was simply sick of waiting years for his title shot and decided to challenge whoever says yes first?

              Comment

              • Boksfan
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2017
                • 9185
                • 277
                • 355
                • 66,176

                #57
                Originally posted by Sledgeweather17
                Fake news you spreading there.

                Stirvirne was Wilder's mando, not Ortiz. But Showtime didn't want to televise Wilder vs Stirvirne, so Wilder paid Stirvirne step aside money so he can fight Ortiz, but Ortiz tested positive for drugs.

                Moral of the story? You lied, Ortiz wasn't Wilder's mandatory when he failed the drug test.
                Yes he lied, Ortiz was Joshua mandatory not Wilder.

                Comment

                • Jkp
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2017
                  • 4671
                  • 306
                  • 669
                  • 71,449

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Boksfan
                  So WBC officially allowing Wilder to only fight boxers who are at least 39 years of age now? Stiverne, Ortiz and next Povetkin, all 39 yo, coincidence? I don't think so :P
                  They're still younger than AJs only decent opponent.

                  Comment

                  • N/A
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2017
                    • 9269
                    • 214
                    • 0
                    • 12

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Cheek busting
                    Gonna be a huge problem with finding venue.

                    Povetkin and his tema were found liable in a federal court in NY - so if they ever fight in the States, they will have their purses held and forfeited to Wilder (I thought it was BS they ruled for Wilder - discrimination against Russian clearly).

                    As long as Povetkin doesn't fight in USA, or leave any tangible assets, accounts, etc. here, he will never pay a dime to Wilder, doe.
                    The information you posted is false. Wilder's $5.2 million was being held in escrow, so there was no way for Povetkin to duck paying. Wilder got his money a long time ago.

                    Comment

                    • Boksfan
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2017
                      • 9185
                      • 277
                      • 355
                      • 66,176

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Jkp
                      They're still younger than AJs only decent opponent.
                      No, Parker is 25, not 39 like all Wilder opponents.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP