Excuses for when golovkin loses thread

[Curt Henning]

Easy to say it happened but you can't or won't back it up, you've come down to 1 ggg fan saying it in this post where as before it was many comments from ggg fans so what was it, many or 1. If it was such a common comment then surely it wouldn't be very hard to find

ok man....you can play that game all you want "oh well show me man"...im telling you man to, what i think is a, man...ive seen it many times....i dont need to go through 3-4 years worth of posts to prove it...i know what i saw and i dont need to make things up......i provided you the context in which it was said and what the argument was....i was involved in it on several occasions....continue to live in fantasyland and pretend it didnt happen though

if i had a week i could provide you with grocery list worth of contradictions and flip flopping golovkins fans have said and done.....but im sure you will pretend those didnt happen either

toodles

[Cutthroat]

So when Bundrage won against Ouma, by a margin of 96-93 96-93 95-94 he also struggled?

I guess, I didn't watch that fight.


I did watch ggg-Ouma and saw both fighters lighting each other up with Ouma arguably winning until ggg came on later in the fight.

[stealthradon]

I guess, I didn't watch that fight.


I did watch ggg-Ouma and saw both fighters lighting each other up with Ouma arguably winning until ggg came on later in the fight.

So he had one "bad" fight, where he was ahead on the scorecards, yet he ended up KO'ing a guy who had only between down twice before?
One was a flash knockdown by Gilbert, who had recent fights at 165 and 172.
The other was in one of his first fights. Jesus, you must really love GGG if you give him this kind of credit.

[Cutthroat]

So he had one "bad" fight, where he was ahead on the scorecards, yet he ended up KO'ing a guy who had only between down twice before?
One was a flash knockdown by Gilbert, who had recent fights at 165 and 172.
The other was in one of his first fights. Jesus, you must really love GGG if you give him this kind of credit.

The fact that Ouma was 2-5 and had recently been knocked down by a guy not even in the top 20 of his division should tell you he's a shot fighter. Ouma himself was not top 15.

When you do arguably worse than a guy from the show the contender, you're not that good.

[stealthradon]

The fact that Ouma was 2-5 and had recently been knocked down by a guy not even in the top 20 of his division should tell you he's a shot fighter. Ouma himself was not top 15.

When you do arguably worse than a guy from the show the contender, you're not that good.

Remember that time Canelo got a gift decision against a guy with a 5-17 whose recent record was 1-10-2?
Or when he struggled with a recent 2-1-2?

[Cutthroat]

Remember that time Canelo got a gift decision against a guy with a 5-17 whose recent record was 1-10-2?
Or when he struggled with a recent 2-1-2?

Was Canelo 30 years old?

[rickJen]

****** threads.
Especially knowing that there are only 2 fighters in the ring.
There's only one loser and one winner.
It's not like it's a lottery where the odds are in trillions or something.
Can you people start accepting losing doesn't mean the end?
Fake fans.
No wonder PBC fighters would rather go inactive and face cab drivers.
They're scared of losing.

[TonyGe]

i most certainly DID NOT make anything up...i dont live in fantasyland..i dont make things up

it was written over here many times over the last 3-4 years....for me to go back and find several examples would take more time than i care to invest on it....but take my word...it happened

whenever someone would bash golovkins resume his fans would stand up "hes a young 33...he hasnt taken punishment...he will be around for awhile...you cant write him off or his resume off yet....he still has plenty of time to make it better"

he takes a step up twice, and barely wins one and gets a draw, and now hes suddenly old and falling off the cliff

How could they say he's a young 33 four years ago. That means he's 37 now. He's 35. Four years ago he was 31. So what the heII are you talking about.

[stealthradon]

Was Canelo 30 years old?

So was Chavez Sr. bad? He lost to Frankie Randall.
Roberto Duran was also bad, then? He lost to Kirkland Laing. His recent record was also shoddy.
And Floyd hardly got by ODLH. He was 4-2 where one of those he won was a robbery, against Sturm, he was struggling with another two others.
Therefore Floyd is a bad boxer.

[TonyGe]

So was Chavez Sr. bad? He lost to Frankie Randall.
Roberto Duran was also bad, then? He lost to Kirkland Laing. His recent record was also shoddy.
And Floyd hardly got by ODLH. He was 4-2 where one of those he won was a robbery, against Sturm, he was struggling with another two others.
Therefore Floyd is a bad boxer.

Your mistake is trying to use logic and facts when dealing with the Golovkin hate club. They aren't interested in these minor roadblocks to their agenda.