Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who is the tougher opponent? Joseph Parker or Luis Ortiz?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Is this a real question? Wtf?

    Comment


    • #12
      Ortiz; even if there are very real questions with regards to just how well he can perform.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
        If championship fights are any indications it doesnt look good for Parker , because he hasnt had many one sided fights since Takam and looked average in them .

        Ortiz is going to bring his best at least we have to assume that bc fighters up their game in title fights .


        Ortiz is the better skilled guy ,by far harder to push around and is overal much better at controlling fights , hes barely lost any rounds while Parker struggles in almost every fight .

        Parker has the better overall resume but looking at the fighters themselves , Ortiz poses the bigger challenge ,i see no performance to think otherwise . Getting a W on him is not as easy as suggested ,hes still a top 3 fighter and has a far better understanding of range and taking away someones jab than Parker does .
        Based on what evidence .. a plodding points win over Malik Scott who was walked down and KTFO by Chisora and Wilder?

        Comment


        • #14
          Parker I'd say Ortiz has Looked shot recently and has heart problems plus has never held a world title. Parker is a world champion younger arguably been in with better competition

          Comment


          • #15
            The 50 year old with high blood pressure.

            Comment


            • #16
              Make an option for equal, they are both top 5 guys

              Comment


              • #17
                It's clearly Ortiz, he's the more dominant fighter and Bryant Jennings would beat everyone on Parker's resume and Parker has really already lost twice to Ruiz Jr and Takam

                Comment


                • #18
                  ortiz is a much better fighter. he's got power, lots of amateur experience, chin looks good.

                  parker isn't particularly fast, but i guess you can say he's faster than ortiz, who is slow. but timing beats speed. bryant jennings was a very athletic fighter, for example, and ortiz was able to time him. certainly more athletic than parker, was jennings.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Am definitely going with Ortiz. He might be old but he is still dangerous.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                      Based on what evidence .. a plodding points win over Malik Scott who was walked down and KTFO by Chisora and Wilder?
                      Based on a 6 inch reach difference and southpaw style which has better take away jab ability bc Ortiz has a better and direct jab than Parker . Wilder relies on his arm length and wont have that advantage here .

                      On top of that the skill level between Joshua and Parker isnt close . Ortiz IS more skilled than Wilder therefore its a better win.
                      Last edited by juggernaut666; 01-15-2018, 03:20 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP