Holyfield makes a great point....it doesn't Diminish what Mayweather did but it clarifies and puts a light on how he cherry picked his way in boxing....but off course people will write essays on why Undisputed means nothing....Undisputed is a rare title for a reason
Comments Thread For: Holyfield: Mayweather Was Never Undisputed at Any Weight!
Collapse
-
-
It's nigh on impossible to get every belt these days unless you're in a division where it's not too difficult to make the bigger fights, like Crawford did. In other divisions where there's other big name belt holders, it's not easy to make those fights.
It's also difficult to juggle all the belts to keep them and keep adding more without getting stripped by some organisation for being unable to do the mandatory due to seeking other fights.
Besides, it's not like every belt holder is a quality fighter anyway. For the better fighters, they could beat an average world title holder and it won't mean a lot.Comment
-
Kangz against Kangz, I'm loving it! Props to Evander for speaking the truth and proving my belief that the brothas can't live in harmony supporting each other's achievements. We wuz undisputed kangz n'shietComment
-
Comment
-
ONLY to the people going AGAINST him in & out the ring.......Comment
-
Seems like u started watchin Floyd later in his career. Pretty boy fought the best and called out the best but we not gonna go back that far huh? Genaro Hernandez was a big favorite over floyd before floyd took his belt to start his reign. Castillo Corrales which floyd was an underdog. Angel Manfredy man the list goes on u can save that he didn't fight anyone in their prime bs. Arum hid Cotto from him n Oscar as well. Money May just chilled the 2nd half of his CareerComment
Comment