Comments Thread For: Vanes vs. Sulecki Ordered, Winner Gets Jermell Charlo Title Shot

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mammoth
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2016
    • 35678
    • 3,831
    • 3,378
    • 378,304

    #31
    Originally posted by SkillspayBills
    Bruh, Don King owns the WBC. IDK how his fighters keep getting continuous mandatory slots even after losses or middling wins.
    Or inactivity. Don King must have put away a lot of money.

    Comment

    • ELHITMAN606
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jun 2017
      • 435
      • 11
      • 0
      • 15,662

      #32
      Yup

      Originally posted by Scipio2009
      After coming up short in three world title fights, Vanes seemed to think that he was somehow entitled to a fourth title shot. Haymon let him out of his deal, he willfully signed with Don King, and after 20 months on the shelf (likely to be a full two years by the time the fight actually happens), he's finally got a final eliminator for another shot at a world title, against a young hungry fighter who's been kept active and seems to just now be peaking on form (and even were he to somehow win, the mandatory likely isn't even due for another year and the unofficial unification tournament at 154 is likely being had with the WBC's blessing).

      Vanes went for what he wanted, so he's now got to live with his decision.
      preach my dude

      Comment

      • Clegg
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2008
        • 24674
        • 3,726
        • 2,307
        • 233,274

        #33
        Looking around, can't see any info on why this fight never happened. Anyone know?

        Comment

        • Mammoth
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2016
          • 35678
          • 3,831
          • 3,378
          • 378,304

          #34
          Originally posted by Clegg
          Looking around, can't see any info on why this fight never happened. Anyone know?
          Sulecki said Vanes sucks and took the Jacobs fight instead

          Comment

          • BM dnobagaV
            Școala vieții
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2015
            • 5593
            • 314
            • 488
            • 49,880

            #35
            I'm curios why are we not getting this fight on the undercard of a GGG-Jacobs rematch in May?

            What the ****..?

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP