Boxing fans are boxing fans, some think you have to be defeated to be great. If you are undefeated it means who have never tested yourself. So go figure.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Posters claim being undefeated means nothing...
Collapse
-
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by Mr Objecitivity View PostFor me, accomplishments matter more than the number of losses a boxer has. Accomplishment = wins. Quality of accomplishment = beating the best possible opponents in one's weight division and the more wins against such opponents, the better quality of one's accomplishment and the more convincingly one beats such opponents in terms of how little they get hit (the less the better), relative to how often they land punches on opponent (the more the better) and how many rounds they win (the more the better), the better the quality of their accomplishment.
If a boxer has 0 losses in amateur boxing but also has 0 gold medals, is that boxer really better than another boxer who has 3 losses but has won 4 gold medals in different tournaments?
Let that sink in!
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostI was considering changing mine to Lewis Ritson.Last edited by BoxingIsGreat; 01-05-2018, 11:56 AM.
Comment
-
Fighters being afraid of losing their 0 is what is partly ruining boxing nowadays, everyone is afraid to step it up and fight eachother
Comment
Comment