Comments Thread For: Hearn admits to overpaying Martin to secure IBF title for Joshua
Collapse
-
-
You do know that this article the thread is apart of has a direct quote from Eddie Hearn saying he paid Charles Martin 6 million dollars to go to England to fight Anthony Joshua right? If a man who was champion for less time than Wilder and was thought of as a lesser fighter than Wilder got 6 million dollars to go to England then why should Wilder not demand more. I know Hearn said he overpaid Martin but that's not Wilder's fault. Hearn set the market.Comment
-
There has to come a point where we can look at a piece of footage and acknowledge what the **** reality is.Last edited by yankees7448; 12-29-2017, 12:24 PM.Comment
-
You do know that this article the thread is apart of has a direct quote from Eddie Hearn saying he paid Charles Martin 6 million dollars to go to England to fight Anthony Joshua right? If a man who was champion for less time than Wilder and was thought of as a lesser fighter than Wilder got 6 million dollars to go to England then why should Wilder not demand more. I know Hearn said he overpaid Martin but that's not Wilder's fault. Hearn set the market.
FFS there's some seriously ******ed people on this site.Comment
-
FFS someone talking about people being ******ed when they don't even know how to read. Dillian Whyte wasn't even mentioned in that post you quoted you muppet.Comment
-
Comment
-
That is actually not what he said. Holy ****. I can't believe I have to quote Lewis Black so often in conversations other than politics but here we go.
At no point in the video was it confirmed that the Breazeale/Molina winner would become the mandatory. I mean for ****'s sake. Its a short video. Not a lot of conversation going on for their to be confusion. When asked on more than one occassion if the winner becomes the mandatory Sulemain essentially says Stieverne was the mandatory, then there is another year before another mandatory is due and he expects things to happen within that year. The closest thing he said to confirming anything about Breazeale was that he would be eligible and the only assumption that can be made is that it is regarding an eliminator.
This was on November 3rd addressing the Molina fight.
Breazeale is the mandatory bc he was ORIGINALLY fighting Stiverne for that spot .
Really is this that complicated ?
Even if the WBC finds loop holes around it , theres nothing to suggest Breazeale is not the mandatory right now .Comment
-
Keep trying to spin, everyone knows what you meant.
Comment
-
A statement on the WBC website read: "This fight will be a final elimination, a fact that adds an extra ingredient of motivation to excel, whatever the odds."
This was on November 3rd addressing the Molina fight.
Breazeale is the mandatory bc he was ORIGINALLY fighting Stiverne for that spot .
Really is this that complicated ?
Even if the WBC finds loop holes around it , theres nothing to suggest Breazeale is not the mandatory right now .Comment
Comment