I'm Against Real-Time Professional Judging

[DuckAdonis]

Lmfao **** idea

[boliodogs]

I think it will never happen so there is no use worrying about it. Can you imagine a huge crowd of fight fans at a big fight waiting an hour to find out who won the fight?

[Gigantes]

Go through War, then have to wait and see if you won or not, and then judge still makes a ****** decision. Probably not. I'd vote no

Live scoring would be a better idea. Baseball, Basketball, Football all have scoreboards, fans and participants know who's winning and who isn't and gives players a try to make a comeback

[jaded]

wait a day before knowing the results?? LMFAO what a ****** idea

larry glaskow? You're perpetually evolving.

[DuckAdonis]

Delay decisions. Not good.
There isnt a perfect system.
But if you ask me, judges should have a monitor to review close rounds and delay those decisions a minute.

That would make for an exciting event wouldn't it. Flying to Vegas to watch a top card and not knowing the result til you get home. What s **** idea.

lol, what an exciting sport that would be, "I hope you enjoyed that grueling championship title fight, tune in next week to find out the winner!"

Go through War, then have to wait and see if you won or not, and then judge still makes a ****** decision. Probably not. I'd vote no

Live scoring would be a better idea. Baseball, Basketball, Football all have scoreboards, fans and participants know who's winning and who isn't and gives players a try to make a comeback

Yeah but i remember Canelo-Trout having Live scoring... Canelo was so far ahead on official cards he just didnt give a **** anymore to give it his best in the later rounds, that messes with the fight aswell

[SkillspayBills]

I would like more judges. You can buy a judge. But two or three judges? I think 5 judges would be the way to go for me.

[Clegg]

A day isn't long enough to make everyone wait. At the end of each year just do one big results show where they are all read out and the world champs come up and collect their belts like it's the oscars.

[McNulty]

I believe that if you watch a recording of a bout, instead of scoring in real-time, you can get a more accurate scorecard. Therefore, I think boxing judges should receive an HD recording of bouts, and a day to review them before making a final score. This would make it harder to write a bad score off as just incompetent judging. What do you guys think?

I've talked about this for years....it's a great idea but it'll never happen. Boxing is a product thats being sold to a customer right? Customers want a result when they pay for a product, not the next day bullshít. They need a climax to end the night.

[Gigantes]

Yeah but i remember Canelo-Trout having Live scoring... Canelo was so far ahead on official cards he just didnt give a **** anymore to give it his best in the later rounds, that messes with the fight aswell

Yea I can see where you're coming from, it can go either way.

I feel if someone see's they are down they can give up, or go for broke. (I know it's totally different sports but just look at last year's superbowl, Atlanta had no way of losing it with the lead and how much time left, yet the Patriots were able to come back-Just seeing a score can bring you down or give you that extra motivation).

If Marquez saw the score cards in the 3rd Pacquiao fight, he might have not taken his foot off the gas and continued to fight rather than fighting to not get knocked down, which in the end made him lose the close decision.

[Gigantes]

I would like more judges. You can buy a judge. But two or three judges? I think 5 judges would be the way to go for me.

I've brought this idea up before. 1 ref per corner, and a 5th being either a ref or someone watching the fight purely on the monitor.

And if there's still a draw, go into overtime, 1 more round. 1min 30 sec lol