Have we been overateing Spence?

[BM dnobagaV]

If Brook didn't have glass eye sockets, Spence would have a controversial loss already...

[Sheldon312]

If you think, Crawford is top p4p then you should have Spence there as well sine Spence has a better name on his resume. Now, I don't think Spence is overrated but I do not think that he will run through guys like Thurman and Porter. With Crawford I think he will have a much better chance due to the size disparity. Spence is a straight line fighter and fighters like that can be outboxed If anyone is overrated it is Crawford.

[Sheldon312]

A "Good Win" and a "Good fight" doesn't make you a p4p fighter. It is consistency of wins and accomplishments, which Spence is not yet doing.

He has a better win on his resume than Crawford and Mikey who you rank highly

[Thraxox]

He has a better win on his resume than Crawford and Mikey who you rank highly

Mikey? No he does not but Crawford yes. But what Spence did is but a fraction to what Crawford have done. That's why he is a top 1-3 P4P.

[Sheldon312]

Mikey? No he does not but Crawford yes. But what Spence did is but a fraction to what Crawford have done. That's why he is a top 1-3 P4P.

Doesn't matter, Spence has Brook, who is better than everyone on Crawford's and Mikey's resume

[FLY TY]

When Spence become P4P #1 (and he will) a lot of folks in this thread are going to feel pretty silly.

And while his trainer insists his defense is better than what we have seen, it needs to be said that Kell Brook landed better against Golovkin and Porter than he did vs Spence.

His defense is not the liability some think, especially if we have yet to see his best.

Spence is actually underrated.

spence blocks a lot of punches with his gloves. i guess, if he does not make people miss like floyd did, he has bad defense?

i'm trying to figure out what ww has this great defense, that makes spence's a liability for him...

Doesn't matter, Spence has Brook, who is better than everyone on Crawford's and Mikey's resume

correct