Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Daniel Jacobs' Manager Hits Back, Roasts Billy Joe Saunders

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Simple mathematics for BJ. Either sell your belt to Jacobs or GGG/Canelo. Who represents the biggest payday? The winner of canelo/GGG does. He'd be ****** to fight Jacobs before and lose the chance of a much bigger payday.

    Comment


    • #12
      Great fight. To bad saunder is a chicken

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by DramaShow View Post
        bjs should show daniel 'wooden spoon' jacobs some respect. after all jacobs went the distance with GGG, something hes immensely proud of and is going to live off of his whole career.
        Gotta admit that was funny

        Comment


        • #14
          As much as I dislike BJS and think Jacobs is a much better human being, BJS is correct in that Jacobs should be the one getting on the plane. In addition, BJS has the better CV, look at this recent wins vs Jacobs’

          Comment


          • #15
            Jacobs is way too dangerous for Saunders. High risk, low financial reward. Saunders will fight a bunch of bums until he gets a shot at Golovkin or Canelo. It's the softer, safer path. Not absolutely sure who wins that fight but I would bet on Jacobs. Saunders would have a hard time picking at Jacobs for 12 rounds without getting some hard return fire. Jacobs is tall, long, fast, skillful, BIG and powerful....This won't be anything like fighting Lemiuex.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Golden Boi 360 View Post
              BJS has a big money fight with GGG/Canelo

              He'd be ****** to risk it fighting Jacobs.
              stfu BJS needs to stop ducking jacobs

              Comment


              • #17
                Team Saunders is right. They don't need Jacobs at this point.
                Jacobs should go for Andrayd. (Don't know why they keep pronouncing it that way, when it's An-dra-de, not Andrayd.)
                They're now both HBO fighters.
                Charlo1 wants none of Jacobs and he's fighting another nobody next.
                And this is what I don't get.
                I don't know what makes these clowns think that fights like Jacobs vs Andrade or Charlo vs Andrade or Charlo vs Jacobs aren't draws.
                Doesn't make any sense.
                They all want Saunders and Cnelo, and pretend to want lil GGG.
                These guys can only fight one guy at a time.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Keith Connolly
                  BJ in a recent non-descript fight sold 300 seats in a gym in Scotland
                  Which fight was this?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by GFunk23 View Post
                    As much as I dislike BJS and think Jacobs is a much better human being, BJS is correct in that Jacobs should be the one getting on the plane. In addition, BJS has the better CV, look at this recent wins vs Jacobs’
                    I agree about Jacobs character. The only thing that slightly irritated me was the weight in issue for the Golovkin fight. Other than that which is minor IMO, he's a stand up guy. Saunders I find irritating. In some ways he's honest but generally he's a jerk.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      I really think Jacobs should go after Andrade.
                      It's a decent name for anyone's resume and he's more beatable than the running man Saunders.
                      Plus the fact that Andrade hasn't been looking good in his last 2 fights which were not even against big names.
                      Any big boy can beat Andrade at this point.
                      Go for it team Jacobs before anyone else does.
                      Waste of time pursuing a Saunders fight.
                      Last edited by rickJen; 12-23-2017, 12:14 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP