Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury: After That Win, Saunders is in Top Ten Pound-For-Pound

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by BoxingTech718 View Post
    Lol how? Nah he ain’t better than:
    GGG
    CANELO
    JACOBS
    CHARLO

    He might get in at 5 but i think he would lose to Lublin too.
    Canelo is just a name lol. GGG clearly won that fight. Canelo's big Middleweight win was Cotto and he didn't even dominate that fight - he clearly won but no domination.

    I'll take Saunders or Jacobs over Canelo...

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Shontae De'marc View Post
      Disagree completely but it was a good fight. Jacobs should be ahead of him on account of almost beating GGG who everyone has on their p4p list.

      Saunders needs to beat a top dog to be talked about in any p4p discussion. Lemieux has always been a C class fighter
      Which top dog has Golovkin beaten to be placed on a P4P list? The answer is NO ONE.

      Comment


      • #23
        Fury just talking up his mate. Nothing to see here.

        Comment


        • #24
          Questions is, skill for skill, who is better? Saunders is light years ahead of most, except for maybe Usyk, Loma, and Crawford.

          Comment


          • #25
            Fury must be smoking his own stools.

            Comment


            • #26
              G beats Lemieux and he just beat a top MW easily and proves he is top 5 p4p. Saunders beats Lemieux easily and he isn't even close to being a top 10 p4p. All because idiots believe the hype sites like this and espn get paid to spew out. There used to be about five stories on G every day. Until he fought someone with a pulse (Jacobs). Saunders could beat Canelo or G. But he doesn't ko the bum of the month like G did, but just puts on a boxing clinic. So the idiots who know nothing about boxing get on here and say G is one of the best ever. He's not even the best today. Saunders is good, but I still wouldn't put him in top 10 p4p, for the simple reason that Lemieux is his best win. It didn't fool me into believing G was Superman when he beat Lemieux and Saunders performance, while impressive, still came against a guy who is a step or two below gatekeeper status.

              Comment


              • #27
                Somebody take those magic powders from him.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Meh if he beats DJ i would put him in top15

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Dr.Cool View Post
                    G beats Lemieux and he just beat a top MW easily and proves he is top 5 p4p. Saunders beats Lemieux easily and he isn't even close to being a top 10 p4p. All because idiots believe the hype sites like this and espn get paid to spew out. There used to be about five stories on G every day. Until he fought someone with a pulse (Jacobs). Saunders could beat Canelo or G. But he doesn't ko the bum of the month like G did, but just puts on a boxing clinic. So the idiots who know nothing about boxing get on here and say G is one of the best ever. He's not even the best today. Saunders is good, but I still wouldn't put him in top 10 p4p, for the simple reason that Lemieux is his best win. It didn't fool me into believing G was Superman when he beat Lemieux and Saunders performance, while impressive, still came against a guy who is a step or two below gatekeeper status.
                    Eubank and Andy Lee are good wins 2

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Bjs v eubank would be good now.
                      People say eubank has improved so would beat bjs.
                      But now it seems bjs has improved and has good wins under belt. So would be interesting

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP