lomachenko is 5'6. every bit of 5'6. but I'll give u that...if u want to say that loma is 5'7 and much much bigger then what he says he is u can have that. in that case thurman is 5'9. i remember the face offs that him and robert had. robert is every bit of 5'9 because I've seen him in person and both guys were the same height. keith has been on record saying he's actually 5'8 in a half to 5'9. he looks 5'9. I do not think lomachenko looked drained at 130. he looked healthy. i have no clue where u saw him being drained at. he was squeezing down to 126 and blowing up against smaller guys (the broner treatment) but that wasn't so much the case at all for 130. lomachenko is tiny compared to thurman and most other welterweights. look at his natural build, reach, height. but BUILD. neck to chest ratio, legs. so fourth. brook walks around at 5'10. porter is a truck. brook pumps a power jab & stands his ground he was able to back up and blast a giant spence let alone lomachenko. keith lands bricks on the outside making a mess of loma. and porter bullys him into submission. these fighters are not only bigger then loma but are more talented then your sosas. wait.....way waaaaaay more talented then guys like walters and sosa. you are talking power with walters but who did he beat? A faded donaire after being almost stopped in that fight? don't talk to me about walters in the same breath as your thurmans. thats a joke.
it's not all about power it's called levels. i have given you real break downs. not just power.
your gameplan is for loma to box and dance circles around thurman? outbox and try to dance.
hummmmmm
ok.
it's not all about power it's called levels. i have given you real break downs. not just power.
your gameplan is for loma to box and dance circles around thurman? outbox and try to dance.
hummmmmm
ok.
Comment