Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: Crawford is Boxing's Best Fighter, Pound-for-Pound

[stuff jones]

Wise guy? Lol, you're the one with the ******est profile name on this website, and you have 4 months on this site soooo... I'm not gonna waste my time

So basically you got nothing?

[Motofan]

Crawford has a damn good argument for #1. He and Loma seem to be friendly if you follow Loma on Instagram. Maybe that plays into it. Maybe not.

[parrish duke]

Crawford should be #1 due to his body of work and how he dispatches his opponents and being truly undisputed at 140!! GGG should be up there, but he has struggled with his recent step up in comp! Loma is dam good, but placing a 9-1 fighter at #1 hurts boxing - period!! injuries / comp / longevity etc... are factors - i want to see where Loma is around his 20th - 25th fight - top p4p is the face of the sport - next few years will be interesting!

[PensionKiller]

Lmao, neither lomachenko nor Crawford is number 1 pound for pound, and whoever has them at #1 is a damn fool who let's the media control what they believe.... Neither of them have beaten pound for pound fighters.. You gotta beat the best to be the best

So who is first then

[Drew Bundini Br]

I’m not mad at your list, but how do you have lomachenko so low? He’s probably top 3-5. For the 10th spot, one could make an argument for Miguel Berchelt. He’s had a hell of a year

The others have better body of work. 9 or 10 fights just doesn't cut it. Some of them are undefeated also. Lomo loss a fight already.

[uniquehump]

I would put Crawford at the top of the list and he would have total control over it if he can beat Spence Jr., just like Ward had a solid hold on it when he beat Kov and GGG or Canelo probably could of got if their fight didn't end in a draw. Crawford did not have anyone on the P4P list to put him at #1 without debate, but he did at least clear out a division. My list so far:

1. Crawford
2. Loma
3. Spence
4. Kov
5. Rigo

Rigo is debatable because of age and inactivity and could be replaced by Canelo or GGG. Kov lost two in a row to the previous #1 P4P and didn't look overmatched. He could also he replaced by Cabell/GGG. Spence is very dominate and more than handled Brook. Loma has been clowning opponents, probably even moreso than Rigo and a win tomorrow may elevate him to #1 on my opinion list, until Crawford can get some good dominate wins at 147 or if he beats Thurman and/or Spence. Crawford is daring to be great and instead of staying at 140 and dominate that division for years to come, he's moved to 147 and appears to be willing to fight anybody, including Spence..... It's hard for me to add any heavyweights to the list. I'm a fan from the 80's and it just seem like the heavy's back then we're so much more skilled and dedicated to the sport.

[Drew Bundini Br]

Lomo does NOT have the body of work that the other champs have.

[boxinggod101]

Wise guy? Lol, you're the one with the ******est profile name on this website, and you have 4 months on this site soooo... I'm not gonna waste my time

Who is number 1 on ur list?

MEX.... hmmmm.?Canelo? Who?

[Pigeons]

Crawford: 2 lineal titles, 1 undisputed title. #1 P4P according to TBRB and BWAA.

[mlac]

Crawford: 2 lineal titles, 1 undisputed title. #1 P4P according to TBRB and BWAA.

Thats all well and good, but who has he beaten? Postol? after The iceman your looking at a bunch of C- level guys and Midgets from lower weight classes.

I know its not Crawfords fault for taking over a very weak division, and he's obviously an elite talent but let's all calm down with the p4p no.1 stuff lol.

IF he beats Thurman or Spence then its clear hes no.1 IMO