Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: Crawford is Boxing's Best Fighter, Pound-for-Pound

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46545
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: Crawford is Boxing's Best Fighter, Pound-for-Pound

    NEW YORK Guillermo Rigondeaux doesn't consider Vasyl Lomachenko the best fighter, pound-for-pound, in boxing. The unbeaten Cuban called Lomachenko "a great fighter," but isn't convinced the unusually skilled Ukrainian southpaw has earned that distinction. Rigondeaux isn't overly concerned about those debates and essentially said those mythical titles are for fans and media to decide.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Ray*
    Be safe!!!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 44867
    • 1,654
    • 1,608
    • 558,890

    #2
    I think its obvious. And his run at 147 would definitely prove it.

    Comment

    • MEXfistology
      Banned
      • Sep 2015
      • 1849
      • 92
      • 1
      • 19,485

      #3
      Lmao, neither lomachenko nor Crawford is number 1 pound for pound, and whoever has them at #1 is a damn fool who let's the media control what they believe.... Neither of them have beaten pound for pound fighters.. You gotta beat the best to be the best

      Comment

      • HarvardBlue
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2011
        • 6762
        • 224
        • 127
        • 41,455

        #4
        I've been saying the same thing and Lomachenko seem to agree.

        Comment

        • MEXfistology
          Banned
          • Sep 2015
          • 1849
          • 92
          • 1
          • 19,485

          #5
          Originally posted by Ray*
          I think its obvious. And his run at 147 would definitely prove it.
          Terrence Crawford has 32 fights on his record in total... Name at least 3 pound for pound fighters he beat, just 3...

          Comment

          • Ray*
            Be safe!!!
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 44867
            • 1,654
            • 1,608
            • 558,890

            #6
            Originally posted by MEXfistology
            Terrence Crawford has 32 fights on his record in total... Name at least 3 pound for pound fighters he beat, just 3...
            You dont need to beat P4P fighters to be ranked on a P4P list.

            Comment

            • CubanGuyNYC
              Latin From Manhattan
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 15276
              • 1,621
              • 1,603
              • 112,127

              #7
              Originally posted by MEXfistology
              Lmao, neither lomachenko nor Crawford is number 1 pound for pound, and whoever has them at #1 is a damn fool who let's the media control what they believe.... Neither of them have beaten pound for pound fighters.. You gotta beat the best to be the best
              So who’s your pick?

              Comment

              • Ray*
                Be safe!!!
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 44867
                • 1,654
                • 1,608
                • 558,890

                #8
                Originally posted by MEXfistology
                Lmao, neither lomachenko nor Crawford is number 1 pound for pound, and whoever has them at #1 is a damn fool who let's the media control what they believe.... Neither of them have beaten pound for pound fighters.. You gotta beat the best to be the best
                I don't think anyone is dis*****g that. But if everyone is the same weight class and they fight each other, Crawford IMHO would be number 1......Thats what P4P means, obviously we would have to see him prove that as he goes up in weight.

                Comment

                • killakali
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 7197
                  • 226
                  • 171
                  • 87,195

                  #9
                  People forget what Indongo had done and that Bud unified all 4 belts. They also forget what Postol did to Matthysse and that no one wanted to fight him. That doesn't even count solid names like Gamboa, Burns, Beltran, and Diaz

                  Comment

                  • Eddy Current
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jun 2017
                    • 8720
                    • 297
                    • 406
                    • 143,787

                    #10
                    Originally posted by MEXfistology
                    Lmao, neither lomachenko nor Crawford is number 1 pound for pound, and whoever has them at #1 is a damn fool who let's the media control what they believe.... Neither of them have beaten pound for pound fighters.. You gotta beat the best to be the best
                    Who is #1 then, wise guy?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP