Comments Thread For: Lomachenko Coach: Rigo Will Have To "Fight" if He Wants To Win

[Herdis]

You can be on your bicycle for 12 rounds and win. What do you think Mayweather did for most of his career, and won clearly although got a lucky decision here and there.

You really are an idiot

[Herdis]

I swear you will say it's a robbery even if it's a consensus 12-0 fight or a KO. You probably had Russell beating him and Walters ahead.

You will give no credit even if your wrong. Seems your predicting a 12-0 or KO Rigo type of fight and I just no there will be no credit given if Lomachenko wins. Surely a guy you predict will lose so badly if he wins should get credit? You won't budge though.

People like you are so pathetic, taking things out of context.

[Herdis]

Nah, you will.

I already know it will be a robbery, the weight was a factor, Rigo was old, Loma is ducking like 9 guys not in his weight class etc;

I predicted this would happen with Walters. I was 100000% right. I'll likely be right again.

You are an idiot.. The reality is that Rigo is 37, going up two weight classes to fight that fraud made popular by white men.. So credit should be given..

Walter, coming off a year off,, shut up you bellend

[chrisJS]

You are an idiot.. The reality is that Rigo is 37, going up two weight classes to fight that fraud made popular by white men.. So credit should be given..

Walter, coming off a year off,, shut up you bellend

Listen clown, I am pointing out that all these people picking Rigo to absolutely dominate the fight, break Loma's jaw, make him quit, drop him, stop him etc; will give no credit if and when Loma wins and I am right. I'm always right on things like this. Surely, when the prediction is so one-sided and clear then the winner would get credit because when a pick is so bold and one-sided then that means those factors (age, weight) were factored in and didn't even matter.

I am pointing to that. Listen, I see boxing as a boxing fan and not in colors or pick sides like you do. Loma is a good fighter but clowns like you will say he's a bum and a fraud which is far from the truth and then claim it's a "white" thing. A true boxing fan (or a mentally secure) human can see past race and can just call things detached from racial emotion or what side they are on. You can't. I can. That's a huge difference between us and it means I can enjoy the sport whereas you view the sport with a lot of contempt and hatred presumably (given your comments) based on ethnicity.

I separate myself from the race rooters like you so sorry if I don't interact more with you. Sure, Walters was off 11 months. But the same race rooters like you on this forum picked Walters regardless and then like you (and other fake fight fans) ****ted on it but many of those same hypocrites refused to acknowledge for example Crawford fought Postol off 10 months layoff and Gamboa (who was also a much smaller man coming up) 12 months (12 is more than 11 FYI) or that Mayweather fought washed up Oscar off 12 months off and washed up Mosley off of 15 months (15 is even longer than 12 FYI). Joshua was facing Klitshcko off 16 months off etc; etc; Lomachenko isn't the only guy to fight a guy off an 11 month layoff when arguably the best fighter in the world (Crawford) fought two guys with basically the same (one month less and one month more) layoffs for his two signature wins. That hypocrisy exists big time and it's perpetrated by clowns like you that blame racism for why a fighter is good or not.

[Dr Rumack]

Rigo will shell up pretty quickly and get through twelve.

It's very hard to see Rigo being busy enough to win. Lomachenko is a very effective shoe-shiner and he will be able to make it look like he's working even if he's not doing anything effective. It's one of the most annoying things about him in some ways, as in his early pro career at least he used to do a lot of shaping and posturing that never had an end product. But against a guy like Rigo it's very important to be able to do that. It's what prevents you from standing there staring at him.

[soul_survivor]

It's very hard to see Rigo being busy enough to win. Lomachenko is a very effective shoe-shiner and he will be able to make it look like he's working even if he's not doing anything effective. It's one of the most annoying things about him in some ways, as in his early pro career at least he used to do a lot of shaping and posturing that never had an end product. But against a guy like Rigo it's very important to be able to do that. It's what prevents you from standing there staring at him.

Yep. Rigo doesnt have the activity to win enough rounds, plus LOmas size advantage will tell and if he hits Rigo often enough, like many fighters of his ilk, he will look to survive.

[chrisJS]

We will see how you play your cards come sunday....and don't be giving lomo rounds just because, I want clean punches & not pitty-pats that don't land.

You must feel dumb now?

No credit for Loma I guess?

[GMAN SUPREME]

rigo had no fight at all. he quit like a punk

[chrisJS]

If lomo wins he wins, I won't front.

You on the other hand, bob arum, fat rafael, espn, hbo, wba will front.

So who's fault was it? Dan Rafael ESPN HBO Arum?

You were way off on this one. Is that the worst pick you've ever made?