Manny vs Crawford

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Zaroku
    RIP BIg Dawg Larry & Walt
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 53366
    • 4,761
    • 10,926
    • 389,015

    #61
    Originally posted by Dr Kewl Hair
    Ditto on this. Manny doesn’t have anything left to trouble Crawford with, it’d have been an incredible fight with prime 140 manny tho.
    I needs a slice of white boy azz....... just a slice...

    Comment

    • bluebeam
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 3839
      • 121
      • 0
      • 31,012

      #62
      Originally posted by WesternChamp
      since you ignored this part, im gonna repeat it again.

      marquez had to fight manny 4 times and with the help of memo to finally "handle" a faded pac. LOL!!!!

      marquez never failed a drug test. so save the memo ****.

      that's like me saying pacquiao was on steroids with ariza. the knockouts stopped after ariza left.

      neither guy ever failed a drug test, so why assume?

      marquez hurt pacquiao in the first and second fights with the same right hand. he just didnt knock him out with it. round 6 in the first fight.

      link for the 2nd fight here
      https://********/-_z-bO5_8Js

      the power been there. after all marquez has more knockout wins than pacquiao.

      they fought 4 times because pacquiao never felt like he truly won any of the fights. you dont fight a guy you felt you beat 4 times
      Last edited by bluebeam; 12-02-2017, 01:55 PM.

      Comment

      • bluebeam
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 3839
        • 121
        • 0
        • 31,012

        #63
        Originally posted by WesternChamp
        and when or if i do, you're gonna say the same thing i said so why are you crying??. i can say pac beat horn and you're gonna say horn got the win on record and that's what matters which is what im saying here regarding pac vs marquez!! .

        that would make you a hpocrite if you do.

        and it would show your inconsistency.

        dont give me that official scorecard sh#t when it benfits a fighter you like. but then say judges got it wrong when its a fighter you dont like.

        all i ask for is consistency in your arguments.

        dont be a fanboy
        Last edited by bluebeam; 12-02-2017, 01:43 PM.

        Comment

        • WesternChamp
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2015
          • 14561
          • 239
          • 73
          • 20,277

          #64
          Originally posted by bluebeam
          that would make you a hpocrite if you do
          no, im explaining to you what you're saying. in your opinion, you felt marquez beat pac, but pac got the win on the record! so i can sit here and say pac beat horn, and you can also say horn got the win on the record and that's what matters.

          Comment

          • Butt stuff
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2014
            • 5577
            • 1,193
            • 3,336
            • 17,572

            #65
            Originally posted by Zaroku
            I needs a slice of white boy azz....... just a slice...
            I ain’t white man but you can have a slice all the same

            Comment

            • Zaroku
              RIP BIg Dawg Larry & Walt
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 53366
              • 4,761
              • 10,926
              • 389,015

              #66
              Originally posted by Dr Kewl Hair
              I ain’t white man but you can have a slice all the same
              Kisses from Tokyo, just a lil **** man **** cabron

              Comment

              • The Big Dunn
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 69264
                • 9,488
                • 7,834
                • 287,568

                #67
                Originally posted by ironmt
                So If Pacquiao wins, as the under dog he will get props, yet If he loses via KO he will be clowned? How exactly does that work considering he Is the under dog and Is expected to lose? Why would he be clowned?
                Yes, if he upsets Crawford he will get plenty of props and credit, as would anyone who has a big upset win.

                If he gets destroyed, he likely will just fade off into oblivion. Of course will get some ribbing and some memes if he gets KTFO again, thats what happens here on NSB.

                So basically, Manny will get treated like any other fighter. I see no reason why you or anyone would be mad about this or expect Manny to be exempt from that treatment.

                Comment

                • WesternChamp
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2015
                  • 14561
                  • 239
                  • 73
                  • 20,277

                  #68
                  Originally posted by bluebeam
                  marquez never failed a drug test. so save the memo ****.

                  that's like me saying pacquiao was on steroids with ariza. the knockouts stopped after ariza left.

                  neither guy ever failed a drug test, so why assume?

                  marquez hurt pacquiao in the first and second fights with the same right hand. he just didnt knock him out with it. round 6 in the first fight.

                  link for the 2nd fight here
                  https://********/-_z-bO5_8Js

                  the power been there. after all marquez has more knockout wins than pacquiao.

                  they fought 4 times because pacquiao never felt like he truly won any of the fights. you dont fight a guy you felt you beat 4 times
                  pac never failed a drug test either so you can shove that back up yours.

                  im just pointing out that marquez didnt "handle" a prime manny like you claim he did. marquez is 0-2-1 against a prime manny. it took marquez a 4th fight and memo to finally "handle" a faded pac.

                  the power's been there? why no ktfo06 then? LOL!! remember what yall said, marquez landed that same right against manny in all 3 of their earlier fights right?? why no ko? i mean, he didnt even drop manny!!

                  Comment

                  • chrisJS
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 8989
                    • 331
                    • 64
                    • 78,477

                    #69
                    Originally posted by WesternChamp
                    pac never failed a drug test either so you can shove that back up yours.

                    im just pointing out that marquez didnt "handle" a prime manny like you claim he did. marquez is 0-2-1 against a prime manny. it took marquez a 4th fight and memo to finally "handle" a faded pac.

                    the power's been there? why no ktfo06 then? LOL!! remember what yall said, marquez landed that same right against manny in all 3 of their earlier fights right?? why no ko? i mean, he didnt even drop manny!!
                    By the same token, why did Pacquaio stop KO'ing fools after the accusations and scrutiny on drug testing?

                    Why didn't he KO him before, well because Pacquaio never jumped head first into a punch in fights I, II & III. These are top level professional prize fighters. Marquez had scored 39 prior KO's including the never before stopped Casamayor and Juan Diaz. He also hurt the always tough Barrera, stopped the always difficult Medina. He had NEVER had a more perfect opportunity for an open counter his ENTIRE career as the one Pacquaio left him with.

                    Why was Pac "prime" in fight III (which you admit you scored for Marquez) but "faded" in fight IV? Did Marquez beat the fight out of him in fight III or did Bradley (Pacquaio won that fight 118-110).

                    Your claims are very one-sided.

                    Name one fighter Pacquaio hurt that was any good prior to Roach. Also bare in mind Roach around that time had fighters failing drug tests. I'm not implying that I am simply wondering why you have no su****ion whatsoever of Pac (when there's more based on their careers) but you are 10000000000% sure Marquez cheated.
                    Last edited by chrisJS; 12-05-2017, 10:39 AM.

                    Comment

                    • WesternChamp
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Oct 2015
                      • 14561
                      • 239
                      • 73
                      • 20,277

                      #70
                      Originally posted by chrisJS
                      By the same token, why did Pacquaio stop KO'ing fools after the accusations and scrutiny on drug testing?

                      Why didn't he KO him before, well because Pacquaio never jumped head first into a punch in fights I, II & III.

                      Why was Pac "prime" in fight III (which you admit you scored for Marquez) but "faded" in fight IV? Did Marquez beat the fight out of him in fight III or did Bradley (Pacquaio won that fight 118-110).

                      Your claims are very one-sided.

                      pac's last ko was against hatton. pac didnt start drug testing until 2014.


                      pac fought margaito, mosley, rios, bradley. which figher has ko anyone of those names mention when pac fought them? those arent the easiest guy to stop.

                      and algieri, vargas, horn, these guys came late in pac's career where he is not the same fighter anymore, do you need me to explain why he wasnt able to stop them?

                      oh, so now pac didnt jump head first that's why he didnt get ko in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd?? but why was there NO knock downs?? i mean marquez landed that same right every time right??

                      also, in the 4th fight when pac got knocked down for the first time in this series, he didnt jump in face first. he was actually pulling back which should have taken some of the impact away. why was marquez able to knock him down then?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP