Originally posted by Earl-Hickey
View Post
Just as Klitschko was about to become available, that's when Wilder ramped up the hype to try to make Klitschko-Wilder a reality for 2016. But Klitschko lost his mandatory defense. That is why they never fought. Klitschko lost 10 months after Wilder won his belt and Klitschko's first defense was negotiated BEFORE Wilder won his belt. So when the hell were they supposed to fight?
"Well fighter a said such and such so it MUST be true"
Then you ignore interviews from other fighters which oppose your view.
Your bias is plain as day yet you hide behind a handke which is designed to look professional when we all know you are just a particularly clever and articulate troll.
There is no bias or agenda beyond the truth. In this instance, the truth is that Klitschko vs. Wilder was being looked at by both sides for 2016, but Klitschko ended up losing to his WBO/WBA mandatory. So the fight was derailed before both sides could clear their mandatories.
Comment