Why do people think Thurman vs Spence is a foregone conclusion??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • john l
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2017
    • 5639
    • 124
    • 190
    • 54,474

    #51
    Originally posted by Sheldon312
    Porter and Berto are head and shoulders above indongo and postol. Gamboa came up two weight classes so that doesn't scream "impressive"
    ?????????????? you need to watch more boxing.Id say Postol is better than Berto and around the same as Porter.Indongo is still little unknown as far as his KO over Troy is hard to judge completely at this point but with win over Burns too id say he is about same already as Berto with a chance to pass him.And I MIGHT rate Porter over him at this point buts its close.How many BIG wins does Porter have?He lost both times he stepped up to top 3.

    Comment

    • Vasyl’s dad
      He said no rematch
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 23510
      • 1,120
      • 1,945
      • 50,072

      #52
      Originally posted by SkillspayBills
      No one thinks Spence would beat Thurman easily. That was literally a strawman argument. Thurman is the man of the division as he is the only unified champion, Spence has the tools to beat him though. It will be a highly competitive, highly fought bout between two undefeated fighters at the peak of their powers. That is exactly what boxing is about.
      Spence takes Keith in 8. I like Thurman, but Spence is too much for him.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP