Depends who is jabbing doesn't it?
Who wins this round??
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Well it is part of my essential scoring criteria.
Credit's given based on imagining a scenario where boxer A or boxer B own a restaurant and ascertaining who is more likely to have a sign that said 'no white' people allowed on it.
Essentially, I'm scoring abstract aggression.Comment
-
This isn’t a science
What if it’s Malignaggi (B) landing the power punches in number, but fighter A is Kovalev, and his two punches wobbled Malignaggi?
Instead of trying to apply a doctrine to your scoring, be impartial and analyse it case by caseComment
-
Yeah this is what I was getting at.
Or even if the jabs themselves were hard shots with the fighter really stepping into it, or even if the other lad walked into it doubling impact. As opposed to a fighter trying to find room around elbows and guard to land on target but not really turning anything over.Comment
-
A jab is suppose to keep the other fighter at bay and set up your other combos. If that other fighter is landing POWER shots at the same level then your jab aint doing SHT!!! Come on THINK!Comment
-
LMAO you had Malignaggi and power in the same sentence... Even his so called power shots look like weak ass jabs.Comment
-
EXACTLY!!! Your JAB ain't working if the other guy is landing the same amount of punches...In fact that sounds like he's walking THROUGH it and it's only a matter of time before the jabber gets Knocked the F-OUT!Comment
Comment