Greatest wins of the last 20 years?
Collapse
-
Tito did not prove to be a great fighter at 160 nor did Chico at 130. Tito was a great fighter though and was clearly a better fighter than Chico no matter how you slice it.You are being extremely hypocritical. You are picking and choosing p4p status when it suits your argument. You can't have it both ways.
My point remains-no matter how great a fighter Tito was, he was not a great MW. Joppy had no significant wins before he fought Tito. Cherifi had lost to Joppy and was a journeyman at best. Mayorga was coming up from 154 when Tito beat him.
It is beyond unreasonable for you to call Bhop's win over him great given the context, and then say that Floyd beating Corrales is not.
It's like saying because Wilfredo Gomez was not a great fighter at 126 that win for Salvador Sanchez isn't as good as Calzaghe's wins over Lacy or Kessler because they were perceived as #1 or 2 at 168 or that Hagler's win over Hearns isn't as good as Barrera's win over Hamed.Comment
-
Comment
-
I do both. I like the atmosphere and the vantage point of a good seat. Really can appreciate certain aspects of the game not captured on camera. Can always watch the fight on the DVR when you get home and there's plenty fights in the year to watch in the living room.
It's a good way of showing your support for the sport and like I said has a great adrenaline about it. I'll take live over living room any day.Comment
Comment