Wilder gets knocked out
Collapse
-
Wilder did try for Ortiz and Povetkin. I can't see how you can hate on that.
He signed for both those fights.Comment
-
He was mandated to fight Povetkin, NO CHANCE he would give Povetkin a voluntary.
It's easy to look at things from a Wilder fanboy POV. He gets no respect from me for being pro 9 years, not fighting ONE top 20 fighter before being given a title shot against Stiverne, who was also bought a title and had inflated rankings. He then has the worst run of title defences in history.
Until Wilder beats someone who I consider to be a good boxer he gets no respect, simple as that.Comment
-
No he tried for an old Ortiz who had clearly faded and looked terrible in his last few fights, who had also been inactive for a year.
He was mandated to fight Povetkin, NO CHANCE he would give Povetkin a voluntary.
It's easy to look at things from a Wilder fanboy POV. He gets no respect from me for being pro 9 years, not fighting ONE top 20 fighter before being given a title shot against Stiverne, who was also bought a title and had inflated rankings. He then has the worst run of title defences in history.
Until Wilder beats someone who I consider to be a good boxer he gets no respect, simple as that.Comment
-
It was good work for Joshua, got rounds in the bank. Wilder will gain nothing from this mismatch.
Takam is active and a much better boxer than Stiverne, much harder to hit clean.
****** comparison really. You just have to look at them to know one is in shape and the other is an old bum.
Say what you want, but I don't got AJ dribbling Stiverne like a basketball in the 1st, and I don't got Takam standing in the 10th looking around like why the ref stop this, against Wilder.
They both fought peasants. One guy made his peasant look like a contender, and the other made his peasant look like a peasantComment
-
Comment
-
Is it ****** to compare 2 peasants over the age of 35, both with losses and KOs on their record? (Well, Stiverne hadn't been KOed, but close enough)
Say what you want, but I don't got AJ dribbling Stiverne like a basketball in the 1st, and I don't got Takam standing in the 10th looking around like why the ref stop this, against Wilder.
They both fought peasants. One guy made his peasant look like a contender, and the other made his peasant look like a peasant
I had a top 10 on here early 2016. Takam has been in my top 10 fighters for years, Stiverne has never been in my top 10...the evidence is there in my post history.
So yes I rate Joshua's win much higher than Wilder's as Joshua fought a much better (IMO) and active fighter who could move. Joshua could easily hurt and put away that Stiverne just as easily as Wilder did. You stand in front of Joshua and you're done for.
I actually think Wilder stands a good chance in an AJ fight. He's stiff and Wilder is much more mobile than Takam, who he struggled to land clean on.
Movement is key, Stiverne is slow and would get KO'd by Joshua easily.Comment
-
See my previous post and understand I think Stiverne is shyt, I don't care about rankings or the belt he won.Comment
-
-
they are so desperte for wilder to be the real deal. its funny though, a lot of these fans are 'sweet scientists', the same people who call golovkin a caveman and dont like him cause of lack of defence and slickness, yet they are big wilder fans lol, i wonder why that is.Comment
Comment