What do You Look FOR in a BOXING MATCH?

[Tony Trick-Pony]

Barrera vs Morales was a much better trilogy. Fighters IN THEIR PRIME, not some washed up Gatti getting his shít pushed in by a C-Level bum. Mickey Ward was a BUM. Nothing you can say will change that.

I don't care who said it was fight of the year or of they made a fictitious movie about Ward, cover of a game, or whatever. Truth is this: Gatti was B-Level at best, washed up, and a C-Level came along at his worst and they bashed each others brains in.

I find that sad.

How humiliating it must have been for Gatti to have to endure such an asś kicking by some C-Level scrub.

Morales vs Barerra, those are the fights you should give a fùck about. Morales was arguably the best ever at that weight. Used to jack Mayweather up in sparring, LEGEND. Not lower tiers.

You're a fan of VIOLENCE, not Boxing.

As I said, you're clearly not a fan of great fights.

But yes.

Morales was great through and through. Always loved watching him. He put the asses in the seats with his all-action style.

[McNulty]

As I said, you're clearly not a fan of great fights.

I've seen 7,000+ Boxing matches. Competed in the AM's, come from a family of Boxers, I am a fan of skilled fighters in great fights.

You're just here for the violence.

If you want to see Gatti vs Ward 4, just hang around a methadone clinic or a soup kitchen on a hot Summer day. You'll see two bums battle for their lives on a daily basis.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

I've seen 7,000+ Boxing matches. Competed in the AM's, come from a family of Boxers, I am a fan of skilled fighters in great fights.

You're just here for the violence.

If you want to see Gatti vs Ward 4, just hang around a methadone clinic or a soup kitchen on a hot Summer day. You'll see two bums battle for their lives on a daily basis.

Damn, dude. Haha. You have a serious bias toward great fights. Well, it's all good. Gatti-Ward is a classic from here on out.

And what are you saying? Morales-Barrera wasn't violent? Oh yeah. Haha. They were giving each other love taps. Every boxing fan loves violence or they wouldn't watch. Maybe figure skating is more up your alley.

[ruedboy]

Barrera v Morales, Marquez v Barrera, Pacquiao v Marquez, Raul Marquez v Israel Vazquez. These were all my type of fight. Two skilled boxers who aren't afraid to trade. No clinches, no bs, just two warriors who come to fight.

[Mr Objecitivity]

I look for a boxer hitting their opponent with the most effective punches whilst rarely getting hit in return. To me, the best type of a win for a boxer in terms of dominance and impressiveness is when the boxer rarely gets hit, but is still able to destroy the opponent with the most effective punches landing (knockout punches or punches which causes bodily damage). See Wladimir Klitschko vs Alex Leapai for an example of what I mean.

[McNulty]

Damn, dude. Haha. You have a serious bias toward great fights. Well, it's all good. Gatti-Ward is a classic from here on out.

And what are you saying? Morales-Barrera wasn't violent? Oh yeah. Haha. They were giving each other love taps. Every boxing fan loves violence or they wouldn't watch. Maybe figure skating is more up your alley.

Gatti was shot and Ward was a bum, the skill level was abnormally low, thus that's NOT a GREAT fight. Call is classic all you want, all it is is two bums bashing each others brains out.

Boxing is violent yes. But we both know what I'm talking about ******. I'll talking about SKILL and you're talking about SWILL. Big difference. That's what I look FOR in a BOXING MATCH.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

Gatti was shot and Ward was a bum, the skill level was abnormally low, thus that's NOT a GREAT fight. Call is classic all you want, all it is is two bums bashing each others brains out.

Boxing is violent yes. But we both know what I'm talking about ******. I'll talking about SKILL and you're talking about SWILL. Big difference. That's what I look FOR in a BOXING MATCH.

******?

Wow.

Take it easy, man.

It's just an opinion.

You don't have to be right.

We can disagree.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

I look for a boxer hitting their opponent with the most effective punches whilst rarely getting hit in return. To me, the best type of a win for a boxer in terms of dominance and impressiveness is when the boxer rarely gets hit, but is still able to destroy the opponent with the most effective punches landing (knockout punches or punches which causes bodily damage). See Wladimir Klitschko vs Alex Leapai for an example of what I mean.

That's cool.

Sometimes a demolition is fun.

I do sway toward the razor-thin wars though, where no outcome is certain.

[john l]

Everyone loves a good fight. However, I do like the technical aspect of a fight. I do look to see how boxers react to punches they're taking. I remember watching Jacobs vs Pirog and from the start I didn't like how Jacobs was reacting to the punches. I look to see if a boxer is getting hit by the same punch repeatedly. I also look at foot work and seeing how punches are getting set up.

yes I love a real master(Mayweather,sweet pea,pep I also like a war corralas vs castilo 1(best ever)gatti vs W ROD,Gatti vs Ward

[john l]

Damn, dude. Haha. You have a serious bias toward great fights. Well, it's all good. Gatti-Ward is a classic from here on out.

And what are you saying? Morales-Barrera wasn't violent? Oh yeah. Haha. They were giving each other love taps. Every boxing fan loves violence or they wouldn't watch. Maybe figure skating is more up your alley.

Morales vs Barrera had a lot more skill then Gatti vs Ward. but I do not agree Ward a bum he was tough bottom top 10 fighter who gave everything he had.and like I said I love watching defencive masters(who are almost always the best fighter)like May,Sweet Pea