What fight would people most like to see in 2018?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • N/A
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2017
    • 9269
    • 214
    • 0
    • 12

    #51
    Originally posted by TonyGe
    I am using my brain. The best fighters right now are in the lower weight classes.
    How are they the best if so many are so much better? If so many would completely annihilate them? Do you not know what words mean?

    Comment

    • TonyGe
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2016
      • 11867
      • 379
      • 149
      • 173,865

      #52
      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
      We're saying they're the best because they're the ones that would win. Please try to use your brain.
      I am using my brain. The best fighters right now IMO are in the lower weight classes.

      Comment

      • TonyGe
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2016
        • 11867
        • 379
        • 149
        • 173,865

        #53
        Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
        How are they the best if so many are so much better? If so many would completely annihilate them? Do you not know what words mean?
        Normally I do but your case apparently not. LOL ...

        Comment

        • N/A
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 9269
          • 214
          • 0
          • 12

          #54
          Originally posted by TonyGe
          I am using my brain. The best fighters right now are in the lower weight classes.
          how are they the best at boxing if they would lose badly to so many other boxers?

          do you not know what words mean?

          Comment

          • Blond Beast
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2007
            • 2848
            • 318
            • 89
            • 51,333

            #55
            p4p is objective of course. Whoever u pick as ur #1 just means it's who u believe is achieving the highest level of excellence in the sport. The term "P4P" makes sense yet it's also misleading as it makes it seem that there is sum sort of mathematical equation involved. From what I can tell it's all about how well u dominate ur division. Ur actual weight in the ring doesn't factor in. Floyd was well lighter than most of his foes. Holyfield beat and held his own against fighters at a much higher weight % advantage than most. As a fan u just gotta take every thing in and just pick who the one guy or girl u think is the best in the world.

            Comment

            • NahMean
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2017
              • 2870
              • 153
              • 0
              • 82,973

              #56
              AJ vs Wilder.. Thurman vs Spence.. GGG vs Canelo then the winner against Jacobs.. Crawford vs DSG/Porter/Brook/Khan are all good fights.. Lomachenko vs Davis assuming he beats Rigo.. Mickey Garcia vs Josh Taylor.

              Comment

              • Blond Beast
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2007
                • 2848
                • 318
                • 89
                • 51,333

                #57
                Oh and yes I want to see AJ vs Wilder. The stakes are highest.

                Comment

                • BoxingIsGreat
                  The Champ
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 19470
                  • 1,684
                  • 2,397
                  • 1,062,888

                  #58
                  Crawford-Spence
                  Davis-Loma (maybe early 2019)

                  Comment

                  • Butt stuff
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2014
                    • 5575
                    • 1,192
                    • 3,334
                    • 17,572

                    #59
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                    The boxer that would beat the other boxer is better at boxing. It's incredible that a concept so simple escapes you.

                    "Well if they were the same size . . ."

                    Well what if every chess player had the same IQ? What if every basketball player was the same height? What if every runner was the same speed? What if every weightlifter was the same strength?

                    You can have any fantasy hypothetical that you wish, but it doesn't change what words mean. The best boxer is the person who is the best at boxing. The one that would beat everybody else. Is English not your first language?
                    I’m assuming you’re wilfully ignorant as no one is this dense.

                    I bet you don’t understand what catch weights are for either.

                    Comment

                    • N/A
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jul 2017
                      • 9269
                      • 214
                      • 0
                      • 12

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Dr Kewl Hair
                      I’m assuming you’re wilfully ignorant as no one is this dense.

                      I bet you don’t understand what catch weights are for either.
                      The only dense people in this thread are those who refuse to recognize the difference between being the best pound for pound and actually being the best. They are two completely different things.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP