How would Deontay Wilder do with Mike Tyson's resume?

[Sheldon312]

Wilder wasnt stronger than Ruddock or Bruno or Lewis.

Power is the last thing Wilder would be worrying about bc he would be easily confused with jabbers that far exceed Washington who was Wilders first similar height opponent who had a jab and it took him 4 rnds just to gage distance in that one .These are the types Tyson fought elite jabbers with more skills that Wilder would be worrying about .

Tyson's biggest wins were Razor Ruddock and old Holmes. Tyson went on to lose every big fight from there.

[juggernaut666]

Tyson's biggest wins were Razor Ruddock and old Holmes. Tyson went on to lose every big fight from there.

Well again im not sure you understand the thread subject . You basically said Wilder is a very poor fighter bc hes not proven to be better than either Ruddock or Holmes and no one in their right mind thinks Wilder has a better resume than Tyson unless they have an agenda on here and thats what the thread is about _

You either have to be drinking or on drugs if you think Wilder would have an easier time with Tysons resume !

[GhostofDempsey]

Loses to Tony Tucker.

Possibly loses to Biggs, Spinks, Ruddock...definitely loses to Holyfield and Lewis.

[KillaMane26]

No.....Razor Ruddock would give problems imo

[mlac]

undefeated! WAR BRONZE BUMMER!

i kid of course he would have 10 or more losses

[Pigeons]

Michael Spinks beat an ATG HW in Larry Holmes twice but apparently he ain't **** because Tyson bulldozed him.

[chrisJS]

Wilder would most likely lose to all of the following -

James Tillis
Trevor Berbick
Pinklon Thomas*
Bonecrusher Smith
Tony Tubbs*
Tyrell Biggs
Tony Tucker*
(old) Larry Holmes*
Frank Bruno
Michael Spinks
Buster Douglas*
Razor Ruddock*
Evander Holyfield*
Lennox Lewis*

He'd be a heavy underdog with all of these and the one's with * he'd have between 0-1% only of defeating but the others a punchers chance of around 10-20% so he may fluke 1 or 2 wins on this list. Also, there's a few other fighters Tyson fought he could just as easily have lost to but he'd have the slight edge like Williams or Golota (due to mental weakness). Tyson's resume isn't that special, but realistically he has about 37 wins better than anything on Wilder's resume and Stiverne (Wilder's best win) wouldn't be in Tyson's top 20-25.


Once Wilder loses his "fans" will throw him on the scrap heap just like they did Broner when he lost just like where they threw Gary Russell etc; etc; That's the game; feared and invincible and all-time great when unbeaten and garbage never liked anyway when they lose. If Ward hadn't been gifted the first Kovalev fight he'd have no fans here.

[RussB23]

Wilder is very underrated

How is he underrated?

C level skills
Terrible footwork
Hasnt beat anyone good
Gets in wars with bums like duhapaus and gets outboxed by washington

[uppercut510]

well Tysons resume wasn't anything to write home about, a few decent names here n there but wilder would lose to a few I assume.

[Mr.Fantastic]

you are aware Tysons resume was dog**** in the 80's right???

Bruno?
Holmes?
Spinks?
Biggs?

You do realize Biggs is a gold medalist right?