He would lose to Spinks Holmes Ruddock Bone Crusher Smith Holyfield Pinklon Thomas Tony Tubbs the 84 Super heavy Olympian can't remember the name but Wilder would lose to all of the above
How would Deontay Wilder do with Mike Tyson's resume?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Wilder hits harder than Lewis that's for sureTyson would have mopped the floor with Wilder and thats the truth. Gerald Washington had him befuddled for about 5 rounds lol. Tyson had a sick chin too, even a shot Tyson took a beating against Lewis before going down so if you think one punch from Wilder puts him out, think again.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
No one mentioned Tucker who would be the most difficult opponent that Tyson fought . He would have height and Jab with great chin . He out boxes Wilder .
The next would would be Ruddock who would be more susceptible to get knocked out but had the power to put your lights out making him more dangerous than Tucker .
Holmes at 38 would still be better than anyone Wilder has fought so far . When you take away from Tyson you take away from Wilder , how can ppl continue not to add up logic on here ? Holmes vs Wilder is probably a 50/50 fight bc Holmes would have maybe struggled with a moving 6'7 footer and wasnt known hard puncher .
Lets not forget Holmes went on to fight well into the 90's against Mercer and Holyfield,his last fight was at age 52 or something vs Butter Bean.
Resumes are subjective but no serious fan can actually compare Tyson entire resume to Wilders whos only actual opponent you could compare to a top guy from the 80's was Stiverne and hes not as good as Tony Tubbs who went 10 with Bowe . That alone puts Tyson and Wilder in real life perspective . I bet hard hitting Alex Steward who Tyson knocked out in one round also gives Wilder trouble in another maybe 60/40 fight in favor of Wilder .
Bruno / Williams / Spinks / Douglas / Holyfield /Lewis six more guys off the top of my head vs who Washington /Duhaupas / Molina and Szpilka ??? Is anyone really trying to say Wilders resume is better ?
Last edited by juggernaut666; 10-11-2017, 09:24 AM.Comment
-
Styles make fights. I would favor Wilder over everyone Tyson had fought due to size and strength advantage.No one mentioned Tucker who would be the most difficult opponent that Tyson fought . He would have height and Jab with great chin . He out boxes Wilder .
The next would would be Ruddock who would be more susceptible to get knocked out but had the power to put your lights out making him more dangerous than Tucker .
Holmes at 38 would still be better than anyone Wilder has fought so far . When you take away from Tyson you take away from Wilder , how can ppl continue not to add up logic on here ? Holmes vs Wilder is probably a 50/50 fight bc Holmes would have maybe struggled with a moving 6'7 footer and wasnt known hard puncher .
Lets not forget Holmes went on to fight well into the 90's against Mercer and Holyfield,his last fight was at age 52 or something vs Butter Bean.
Resumes are subjective but no serious fan can actually compare Tyson entire resume to Wilders whos only actual opponent you could compare to a top guy from the 80's was Stiverne and hes not as good as Tony Tubbs who went 10 with Bowe . That alone puts Tyson and Wilder in real life perspective . I bet hard hitting Alex Steward who Tyson knocked out in one round also gives Wilder trouble in another maybe 60/40 fight in favor of Wilder .
Bruno / Williams / Spinks / Douglas / Holyfield /Lewis six more guys off the top of my head vs who Washington /Duhaupas / Molina and Szpilka ??? Is anyone really trying to say Wilders resume is better ?
Comment
-
Wilder wasnt stronger than Ruddock or Bruno or Lewis.
Power is the last thing Wilder would be worrying about bc he would be easily confused with jabbers that far exceed Washington who was Wilders first similar height opponent who had a jab and it took him 4 rnds just to gage distance in that one .These are the types Tyson fought elite jabbers with more skills that Wilder would be worrying about .Comment
Comment