Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[john l]

Don’t worry about WesternChimp. That dude is a moron and obsessed with me. You happened to catch him during his mental breakdown. He’s going thru a Spoon like meltdown, as you can see.

Yea he is crazy fanboy.take care

[koolkc107]

No West people just get sick of saying same thing over and over to a ***in stone.Just because you can ware them out with your ******ity don't mean you won argument.

Thank you for saying this, john l.

You doing so might make them think about how many others see it too and just aren't saying anything.

Lord knows we have tried to get the point across.

It's really not complicated and the truth has been shown to them more times than I can count.

I get liking a fighter and wanting to defend him.

But, if that means you have to lie about another fighter, what does that make you?

I guess some folks don't go that far in their thought process, don't mind looking like fools for thousands of posts.

Thank you again for your candor, john l.

[john l]

Thank you for saying this, john l.

You doing so might make them think about how many others see it too and just aren't saying anything.

Lord knows we have tried to get the point across.

It's really not complicated and the truth has been shown to them more times than I can count.

I get liking a fighter and wanting to defend him.

But, if that means you have to lie about another fighter, what does that make you?

I guess some folks don't go that far in their thought process, don't mind looking like fools for thousands of posts.

Thank you again for your candor, john l.

Thank you very much for nice post.And your right 1000% about some of them just not WILLING to see.I deff need to learn to just walk away earlier lol.

[koolkc107]

yo travesty and kool... yall seem pretty quiet.. what's up brah? LOL!! why yall not posting in that other thread? yall still exchanging pm's

You talking about the copy-cat thread your banned ****** loving buddy made after the first copy cat thread?

Why would we post a lot there, it aint about shyt.

If you are looking to join this discussion I will direct you to 2 of my posts.

#1654 explains why any argument about how dehydrated Floyd may have been or may not have been is moot. It also explains that an emergency did not have to exist either.

There are 4 criteria for granting a TUE.

Meet any 1 of them and a TUE can be filed and granted retroactively.

These fools have spent thousands of posts arguing a moot point. To his credit, Travestny slapped them around repeatedly like the lil byotches they are, but he did that for his own amusement, not because he had to. He knows what time it is better than I do on this.

#1658 is a question I am asking all folks who became indignant in Sept 2015 about Mayweather allegedly cheating. This, when all the info needed was published in May 2015. If the shoe fits, answer it.

Any questions you post that indicate you haven't caught up to where we are at will no longer be answered.

Have a nice day.

[koolkc107]

Thank you very much for nice post.And your right 1000% about some of them just not WILLING to see.I deff need to learn to just walk away earlier lol.

Kinda hard to walk away from my own thread.

But, I am learning to shut idiots down a lot better.

Thank you again.

[john l]

Kinda hard to walk away from my own thread.

But, I am learning to shut idiots down a lot better.

Thank you again.

No I was just takin about ME needing to learn to learn to walk away.(irish temper lol)

[Shape up]

You talking about the copy-cat thread your banned ****** loving buddy made after the first copy cat thread?

Why would we post a lot there, it aint about shyt.

If you are looking to join this discussion I will direct you to 2 of my posts.

#1654 explains why any argument about how dehydrated Floyd may have been or may not have been is moot. It also explains that an emergency did not have to exist either.

There are 4 criteria for granting a TUE.

Meet any 1 of them and a TUE can be filed and granted retroactively.

These fools have spent thousands of posts arguing a moot point. To his credit, Travestny slapped them around repeatedly like the lil byotches they are, but he did that for his own amusement, not because he had to. He knows what time it is better than I do on this.

#1658 is a question I am asking all folks who became indignant in Sept 2015 about Mayweather allegedly cheating. This, when all the info needed was published in May 2015. If the shoe fits, answer it.

Any questions you post that indicate you haven't caught up to where we are at will no longer be answered.

Have a nice day.

You were right with 1 thing, there is 4 criteria for granting a TUE BUT ALL 4 CRITERIA MUST BE MET YOU IMBECILE.
2.0 Criteria for Granting a TUE
An Athlete may be granted a TUE if (and only if) he/she can show that each of the
following conditions is met:
a. The Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method in question is needed to treat an acute or chronic medical condition, such that the Athlete would experience a significant impairment to health if the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method were to be withheld (ISTUE Article 4.1(a)).
b. The The****utic Use of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method is highly unlikely to produce any additional enhancement of performance beyond what might be anticipated by a return to the Athlete’s normal state of health following the treatment of the acute or chronic medical condition (ISTUE Article 4.1(b)).
Although there may be some enhancement of individual performance as a result of the efficacy of the treatment, nevertheless, such enhancement must not exceed the level of performance of the Athlete prior to the onset of his/her medical condition.
c. There is no reasonable The****utic alternative to the Use of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (ISTUE Article 4.1(c)).
Three points should be noted in relation to reasonable The****utic alternatives:
 Only valid and referenced medications are to be considered as alternatives.
 The definition of what is valid and referenced may vary from one country to another. These differences should be taken into account. For example, a medication may be registered in one country and not in another, or approval may be pending, etc.
 There may be instances where it is not medically appropriate to try the alternatives before Using the medication containing the Prohibited Substance. In these cases, the physician is to state why.
d. The necessity for the Use of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method is not due, wholly or in part, to prior Use (without a TUE) of a substance or method that was prohibited at the time of such Use (ISTUE Article 4.1 d).
WADA documents titled “Medical Information to Support the Decisions of TUECs” (TUE Physician Guidelines) assist physicians and ADOs in applying these criteria to particular medical conditions. These documents are available on WADA’s Web site

[Shape up]

Kinda hard to walk away from my own thread.

But, I am learning to shut idiots down a lot better.

Thank you again.

You say things like this and make such a fool of yourself nuffy, I see you have another alt in this thread, you must be feeling the heat with no answers and completely wrong statements gimp

[Shape up]

Hey ADPO2, did you see above how this gimp TOOLI thinks you only have to pass 1 criteria to be given a TUE, 171 pages in and he doesn't even know the basics, what a dichead

[Shape up]

here he is explaining it. doesnt seem like it was an emergency or anything like that. in fact, his response is kinda almost seem like its a joke. like he's just throwing a bunch of bs out there to act like he answered the question at hand.

Yeah, I know bro, it was a farce, USADA let fluid do whatever he wanted, that's what you get when you pay 150k, service with a smile and they turn a blind eye to anything, the way they act in the video makes me wonder how many fights previously has he been allowed to have IVs and USADA have let him get away with it