Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[travestyny]

Truth is, those things they left out are not needed in a professional boxing match when perhaps they would be needed in Olympic festivals or international competitions.

For example, Article 11 refers to teams when a boxing match is individuals.

Article 16 is about doping for animals competing in a sport.

Articles 18 and 19 deals with Education and Research respectively.

But Ship out's lying ass would have you believe that omission of these articles in the contract are some sort of smoking gun.

EXACTLY!!! Poor old ship-out is taking a beating!

[Shape up]

Keep reading children, you can talk your way out of this, as for the protocol summary, that has already been written out via the contract, you 2 gimps are funny, scrambling to try and fight for the honour of your boyfriend whom you don't even know, you 2 are like some demented stalkers

[travestyny]

Keep reading children, you can talk your way out of this, as for the protocol summary, that has already been written out via the contract, you 2 gimps are funny, scrambling to try and fight for the honour of your boyfriend whom you don't even know, you 2 are like some demented stalkers

Shut your dumb ass up and keep hiding. You've embarrassed yourself, as usual. Hold that "L," biotch.

[koolkc107]

Keep reading children, you can talk your way out of this, as for the protocol summary, that has already been written out via the contract, you 2 gimps are funny, scrambling to try and fight for the honour of your boyfriend whom you don't even know, you 2 are like some demented stalkers

This thread was about how all theories of Floyd cheating eventually fail.

Ship out, I actually have to thank you and all the other butthurt posters for volunteering to be the human cannon fodder that made this such an outstanding thread.

Couldn't have done it without ya, kid.

From the misappropriate citations, shameless editing of facts to suit your bad arguments, and the outright lies, to the countless strawmen arguments you tried to introduce and pass off as actual takes, I and others who know Mayweather is a clean fighter are forever indebted to you.

You have my thanks and eternal gratitude.

Oh yeah, about that shoe we put so far up your ass?

You can keep it as a souvenir after the surgeon removes it.

[Shape up]

Definition of SUBSTANTIVE---- having a SEPARATE and INDEPENDANT EXISTANCE

[Shape up]

so let's start at the easy question, how can a TUE for usada not have scope for an appeal, which is part of the ISTUE, you 2 weasels have been telling everyone in YOUR posts that USADA HAS TO FOLLOW WADA protocol

[Shape up]

LMAOOOOOOO. YOU ARE AN ABSOLUTE IMBECILE.


Say it with me one more time
USADA ISNT ALLOWED TO BREAK WADA RULES

Can you understand that, or no? Let me know

so this above is your post, were you wrong, a simple yes or no ******NY

[Shape up]

[QUOTE=Shape up;18149217]From the contract----------- Rules 4 mayweather and pacquaio agree that articles 1 through 10 and 24.2 and the associated definitions, of the world anti doping code shall be the substantive anti doping rules for all purposes in relation to the competition and the period of pre and post competition testing provided for in this agreement---------now let's look at the definition of substantive again, HAVING A SEPARATE AND INDEPENDANT EXISTANCE--------- so the contract says that articles 1-10 and 24.2 from the WADA code have a SEPARATE AND INDEPENDANT EXISTANCE from all the other anti doping rules FOR ALL PURPOSES IN RELATION TO THE COMPETITION---------IS THIS CORRECT WEASELS, a simple yes or no

[Shape up]

23.2 Implementation of the Code
23.2.1 The Signatories shall implement applicable Code provisions through policies, statutes, rules or regulations according to their authority and within their relevant spheres of responsibility.
23.2.2 The following Articles as applicable to the scope of the anti-doping activity which the anti-doping organization performs must be implemented by Signatories without substantive change (allowing for any non-substantive changes to the language in order to refer to the organization’s name, sport, section numbers, etc.):
• Article 1 (De nition of Doping)
• Article 2 (Anti-Doping Rule Violations)
• Article 3 (Proof of Doping)
• Article 4.2.2 (Speci ed Substances)
• Article 4.3.3 (Wada’s Determination of the Prohibited list)
• Article 7.11 (Retirement from Sport)
• Article 9 (Automatic disquali cation of individual Results)
• Article 10 (Sanctions on Individuals)
• Article 11 (Consequences to Teams)
• Article 13 (Appeals) with the exception of 13.2.2, 13.6, and 13.7
• Article 15.1 (Recognition of Decisions)
• Article 17 (Statute of Limitations)
• Article 24 (Interpretation of the Code)
• Appendix 1 - De nitions
World Anti-Doping Code • 2015 121------- this for example, usada does not have to comply with any of these rules as written in the fight contract, so they said we will comply with article1-10 in the code dut then articles such as this one allows them to break them, is that easy enough for your feeble little mind to understand, or is it still too complicated

so according to the contract, all of this above means jack ****, it is omitted from having to be followed by USADA

[Shape up]

[QUOTE=Shape up;18149302]14.1.2 Notice of Anti-Doping Rule Violations to national anti-doping organizations, international Federations and Wada
The anti-doping organization with results management responsibility shall also notify the athlete’s national anti-doping organization, international Federation and Wada of the assertion of an anti-doping rule violation simultaneously with the notice to the athlete or other Person.-----------------this rules USADA doesn't have to worry about, it's omitted from the contract, they don't have to follow it